– ´´The prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment methods of diseases need to improve so much faster by very efficient scientific research and projects. Unfortunately there´re unknown diseases, fatal diseases, rare diseases and other diseases. There´re a lack of total or partial understanding of them. The world needs to have very efficient and detailed scientific research and projects resulting in new drugs, vaccines, medical devices, therapeutic substances and other types of technologies to help people live better and longer, more and more. The age of the humans, animals and the genetics, physiology, biochemistry related to them influence directly in determined ways in human expectancy of life´´. Rodrigo Nunes Cal
– https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ http://www.darpa.mil http://www.usa.gov http://www.fbi.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.nih.gov http://www.genome.gov http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.instagram.com http://www.facebook.com http://www.twitter.com http://www.facebook.com/scientificblog
– Mestrado – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Tabelas, Figuras e Gráficos – Tables, Figures and Graphics
– https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/contact/
– https://www.gainestownship.org/gaines_charter_township/national_official.php
– http://www.cdc.gov http://www.fda.gov http://www.pfizer.com https://www.kth.se/en
– http://www.time.com http://www.wikipedia,org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.nih.gov http://www.genome.gov http://www.whitehouse.gov http://www.darpa.mil http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nejm.com https://www.gov.br/pt-br https://www.gov.br/pf/pt-br http://www.abc.org.br/ https://www.nasonline.org/ https://www.cam.ac.uk/
https://www.ox.ac.uk/ https://ki.se/ http://www.time.com http://www.wikipedia,org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.nih.gov http://www.genome.gov http://www.darpa.mil http://www.whitehouse.gov http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nature.com http://www.nejm.com http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.nasdaq.com http://www.harvard.edu http://www.ucla.edu http://www.stanford.edu http://www.nasa.gov http://www.princeton.edu http://www.famerp.br http://www.ita.br http://www.embraer.com http://www.uftm.edu.br http://www.usa.gov https://www.gov.br/pt-br http://www.cia.gov http://www.fbi.gov https://www.gov.br/pf/pt-br http://www.columbia.edu http://www.nyt.com http://www.wsj.com http://www.reuters.com http://www.ft.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.abc.com http://www.abc.org.br/ https://nasonline.org http://www.wellsfargo.com http://www.worldbank.gov http://www.twitter.com http://www.facebook.com http://www.linkedin.com http://www.facebook.com/scientificblog https://www.cam.ac.uk https://www.ox/ac/uk https://ki/se http://www.yale.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.caltech.edu http://www.spacex.com http://www.tesla.com http://www.amazon.com http://www.alibaba.com http://www.amazon.com
– Nanomedicina –> Texto que redigi
– Nanomedicine –> Text I typed
– LISTA DE NOMES – PEOPLE´S NAMES – E-MAIL LIST – LISTA DE E-MAILS-converted – People´s names who liked of the e-mail list I did in 2015 and sent a positive feedback to me by e-mail. Nome das pessoas que gostaram da lista de e-mails que fiz em 2015 e me enviaram um feedback positivo pra mim pelo e-mail.
List of people who gave me a positive feedback by e-mail about an excellent, detailed and very extensive e-mail list I did in 2015 from 20 Best Universities of the World. This e-mail list is more related to the Area of Biological Sciences. I sent it to a very big amount of excellent professors, scientists and/or researchers of Brazil and other countries of the world. A summary about this Project (e-mail list) was sent to them too. Very important information about the e-mail list I did in 2015: A little more than 32,000 e-mails of researchers, professors and/or scientists were cataloged by me. It was a very hard work, of course. Very Important Note: I did not earn any money with this project nor with this blog. The sharing of this blog is fundamental to the World Scientific Community and other people worldwide, of course. I sent this e-mail list to many people of the Scientific Community in Brazil and other countries. After a while, I send an other e-mail to so much people like American and Brazilian Govern, informing that I didn’t ask permission from each of them to put their e-mail on the e-mail lists I did. Note: To do it, of course, it would be necessary to send an e-mail with the objectives of the e-mail list to each person that I wanted to put the e-mail address in the e-mail list. It would be an extremely hard work, of course, and the e-mail list would be done so much later with the different number of people in the e-mail list because as many people know, each one has your own opinion and thoughts about a subject, for example. And the other hand, I did the e-mail lists in 2022 related to people who are linked to Excellent Research and Teaching Centers of the World without asking permission to each person to I know if I can put the e-mail address in the email lists or not. So, I send e-mail messages to them informing this blog that has a very big amount of relevant information and knowledge like websites, links, YouTube Videos, images, social networks and other types of technologies and and informing a very important note that I don´t earn any money from this blog. I also informed in the e-mail message to them that if she or he no longer wanted to receive my e-mails, he or she just reply me Unsubscribe. Comparing with the total number of e-mails cataloged by me in these new e-mail lists that I made in 2022 (I don’t know the number of e-mail addresses), a few people responded to me Unsubscribe by e-mail.
It is very important the people worldwide live better and longer, more and more, by very efficient scientific researches and projects, resulting in new ideas to humanity like new platforms and websites to professors, students, researchers and/or scientists and/or other people worldwide, depending of the type and objectives of the inventions.
It´s fundamental the invention of new vaccines, drugs, therapeutic substances, medical devices and other types of prevention, diagnostic, prognostic and treatment methods. Unfortunately there are so much diseases and there are the rare diseases, unknown diseases and fatal diseases. The Scientific Discoveries is extremely important to the world people, for sure.
The Interaction between different Departments is very important, including the same types of Departments but from different Research Centers in different parts of the world in different aspects. However, projects on this subject will always be fundamental for national and global progress, for sure.
My intentions to do this e-mail list in 2015 and for sending it to many professors, scientists and/or researchers worldwide were and are always to contribute significantly to world progress, helping their work in anyway, in different situations, for example, to share ideas, research evidence, experiences and skills, not falling under data protection laws and fines, of course. Therefore, hitting the same key, coming back on the same subject, as many people know, the interactions among Academic Departments in different countries are very important to the world progress. So, these interactions among people need to be very efficient and faster, of course. It is very important the creation of very efficient platforms and websites to people who are linked to the Scientific Community, for sure.
I NEVER want to harm myself either financially and/or psychologically with this e-mail list I made in 2015. For example, a professor may not or would not like an e-mail sent to him by a person with whom I sent the e-mail list that I did in 2015 even not falling under Laws that are linked to the protection of data and fine.
A interação entre diferentes Departamentos de Centros de Pesquisa é muito importante, inclusive os mesmos tipos de Departamentos só que de diferentes Centros de Pesquisa nas mais diversas partes do mundo nos seus diferentes aspectos. Contudo, projetos sobre este assunto sempre serão fundamentais para o progresso nacional e mundial.
If anyone wants to use the email lists I made in 2022, the person will have to send an e-mail to the following e-mail address and/or e-mail addresses: chancellor@ucla.edu president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov president@ucop.edu go.usa.gov@gsa.gov nimhinfo@nih.gov nhgripressoffice@mail.nih.gov vice.president@whitehouse.gov comments@whitehouse.gov asking if the person can send the e-mail lists or not. As many already know, the Internet originated in the USA and I NEVER want to harm myself with these e-mail lists I did financially nor psychologically for anyone. It was a very difficult work to make it, and it could be very useful for the World Scientific Community in the various sectors of world society. Very important note: I sent yesterday and today (01/07/2023 and 01/08/2023) to these e-mail addresses mentionated above the link of the Google spreadsheet that I have in which the e-mail lists is located and the description of the subject of the e-mail message. These e-mail lists is related to the large number of people directly connected with Excellent Research and Teaching Centers in the World and the description of the subject to the email addresses emails already mentioned above in this post. I don’t want to ever harm myself in any way financially nor otherwise with these email lists I did, as, for example, a professor, researcher and/or scientist being indignant with who made the email lists (in my case) without his permission, even though there is no reason to trigger the Personal Data Protection Act and other Laws related to the matter against another person (other than me) who used the email lists I did causing this person to pay a fine of a certain amount of money. As many people already know, there are very strict laws in the world that involve a lot of fine money on this matter. Very important note: There was a situation where a person didn’t like it al all that I put his email address and after I sent him an email message, asking me to remove his email address immediately from the email list I made, even though I didn’t informed that I made an email list. In all the cases where people asked me to remove their email addresses from my contacts to I do not send email message to them anymore and in the other cases where I sent too emails to other people, I didn’t inform them that I had made an email lists. There were some cases in which some people informed me to remove their email addresses from the email list I made, even though I had not informed them of this, and none of these people wanted to know about the email list I made. Many people have asked me not to send them any more emails (Unsubscribe). Very Important Note: An extensive list of emails I made in 2015 (just over 32,000 registered emails) related to researchers, professors and/or scientists from the 20 Best Universities in the World was sent together with a Project Summary to a large amount of professors, researchers and/or scientists from Brazil and the whole world (I received positive feedback on this from many people who received this email list; there is the name of each one of them in this post) highlighting the importance of having in the world a strong connection between University Departments for more efficient communication between people in various aspects, for example, to improve the work of the people involved and consequently, improve research and scientific projects in the World). It was an extremely difficult job, there were two cases of very competent professors, doctors, scientists and/or researchers in the area who informed me (one informed me the cell phone number by email so that I could call him after he had read the email sent to him containing the email list and the other doctor informed me on his office during a medical consultation that it would be good if you filed a patent on these email lists because the project was very good, however, for financial reasons, I decided not to trigger the patenting process. On this same subject, I received an excellent feedback from the email President@ucop.edu about the email list (Project) I made in 2015, I just don’t know the name of the person who emailed me a while ago, letting me know which would file the project in the UCLA database (University of California at Los Angeles, where the first Internet connection took place; The Internet was created in 1969, in the United States. Called Arpanet, it had the function of interconnecting laboratories That year, a professor at the University of California passed the first e-mail in history to a friend at Stanford. This network belonged to the US Department of Defense). I received a job offer from the UCLA Library via email around this time, but I didn’t want to take any chances. http://www.library.ucla.edu/contact I left this list of emails from 2015 on a blog I had durant a time (I don’t remember exactly the time) for anyone to download. Observation: This 2015 mailing list I did was more related to the Biological Sciences Area. Very Important Note: I did not earn any money with this project (2015) nor with my blog. I did not ask permission to each person who I put the e-mail in the e-mail list I did in 2015. So, I informed it to people linked to American and Brazilian govern, many professors, scientists and/or researchers to not cause any problem for me not for anyone years ago. @ https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states +1 (305) 257-9442 +34 910 782 483 contact@igerent.com http://www.google.com http://www.usa.gov https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ https://go.usa.gov/contactus president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov go.usa.gov@gsa.gov #Team #laws #Possibilities #supositions #suposições #ManyProbabilies #SoMuchMoney #MuitasProbabilidades #Facts #Fatos #MuitoDinheiro #EmailLists #feelings #actions #questions #sources #fontes #origin #Origem #Reading #leitura #EmailMessage #MensagemNoEmail #Internet #decisions #FastActionByEmail #City #Country #researchers #professors #scientists #students #govern #USA #CIA #FBI #VeryHardWork #WorldHistory #InternetHistory #pionners #contributions #lives #pionner #information #knowledge #article #articles #journals #television #radio #Internet #magazines #researches #ideas #energy #cell #DNA #websites #blogs #links #videos #images #Universities #Faculties #schools #TopResearchCenters #World #countries #cities #diffusion #SocialNetworks #DifferentPrices #PreçosDiferentes #money #prices #teams #investigations #analysis #authorities #Consequences #EmailMessages #consequências #possiblidades #HumanRights #DireitosHumanos #project #projects #patent #patentes #Confirmation #country #equipe #equipes #time #tempo #times #tempos #probabilities #probabilidades #person #people #pessoas #pessoa #E-mailMessages #health #life @ http://www.usa.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.fbi.gov http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.forbes.com http://www.nasa.gov http://www.ucla.edu http://www.harvard.edu http://www.mit.edu http://www.stanford.edu http://www.columbia.edu http://www.stripe.com https://www.cam.ac.uk/ https://www.ox.ac.uk/ http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nejm.com http://www.nature.com https://ki.se/ http://www.yale.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.duke.edu
A interação entre diferentes Departamentos é muito importante, incluindo os mesmos tipos de Departamentos só que de diferentes Centros de Pesquisa nas diversas partes do mundo. The Interaction between different Departments is very important, including the same types of Departments but from different Research Centers in different parts of the world https://www.ucop.edu/ https://www.library.ucla.edu/biomed/staff.
Observação muito importante: Enviei ontem (07/01/2023) para estes endereços de e-mails chancellor@ucla.edu president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov president@ucop.edu go.usa.gov@gsa.gov nimhinfo@nih.gov nhgripressoffice@mail.nih.gov e hoje (08/01/2023) p/ vice.president@whitehouse.gov comments@whitehouse.gov o link da planilha Google que tenho na qual está a lista de e-mails que fiz em 2022 com o conteúdo da mensagem de e-mail. Esta lista de e-mails está relacionada à grande quantidade de pessoas ligadas diretamente com Excelentes Centros de Pesquisa e Ensino do Mundo e a descrição do assunto da mensagem do e-mail para estes endereços de e-mails. NÃO quero me prejudicar JAMAIS em NENHUM aspecto financeiramente nem de outra forma.
Se alguém quiser usar as listas de e-mails que fiz em 2022, a pessoa terá que enviar e-mail pedindo, se possível, para o(s) seguinte(s) endereço(s) de email(s) chancellor@ucla.edu president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov president@ucop.edu go.usa.gov@gsa.gov nimhinfo@nih.gov nhgripressoffice@mail.nih.gov e hoje p/ vice.president@whitehouse.gov comments@whitehouse.gov enviar a lista de e-mails. Como muitos já sabem, a Internet teve origem nos EUA e NUNCA quero me prejudicar com estas listas de emails financeiramente nem psicologicamente por alguém. Foi um trabalho muito difícil fazê-la, podendo ser muito útil para a Comunidade Científica Mundial nos vários setores da sociedade mundial.
– If anyone wants to use the e-mail lists I did in 2022, the person will have to send e-mail to the following e-mail address and/or e-mail addresses: chancellor@ucla.edu president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov president@ucop.edu go.usa.gov@gsa.gov nimhinfo@nih.gov nhgripressoffice@mail.nih.gov vice.president@whitehouse.gov comments@whitehouse.gov asking if the person can send the e-mail lists or not. As many already know, the Internet originated in the USA and I NEVER want to harm myself with these e-mail lists I did financially nor psychologically for anyone. It was a very difficult work to make it, and it could be very useful for the World Scientific Community in the various sectors of world society. Very important note: I sent yesterday and today (01/07/2023 and 01/08/2023) to these e-mail addresses mentionated above the link of the Google spreadsheet that I have in which the e-mail lists is located and the description of the subject of the e-mail message. These e-mail lists is related to the large number of people directly connected with Excellent Research and Teaching Centers in the World and the description of the subject to the email addresses emails already mentioned above in this post. I don’t want to ever harm myself in any way financially nor otherwise with these email lists I did, as, for example, a professor, researcher and/or scientist being indignant with who made the email lists (in my case) without his permission, even though there is no reason to trigger the Personal Data Protection Act and other Laws related to the matter against another person (other than me) who used the email lists I did causing this person to pay a fine of a certain amount of money. As many people already know, there are very strict laws in the world that involve a lot of fine money on this matter. Very important note: There was a situation where a person didn’t like it al all that I put his email address and after I sent him an email message, asking me to remove his email address immediately from the email list I made, even though I didn’t informed that I made an email list. In all the cases where people asked me to remove their email addresses from my contacts to I do not send email message to them anymore and in the other cases where I sent too emails to other people, I didn’t inform them that I had made an email lists. There were some cases in which some people informed me to remove their email addresses from the email list I made, even though I had not informed them of this, and none of these people wanted to know about the email list I made. Many people have asked me not to send them any more emails (Unsubscribe). Very Important Note: An extensive list of emails I made in 2015 (just over 32,000 registered emails) related to researchers, professors and/or scientists from the 20 Best Universities in the World was sent together with a Project Summary to a large amount of professors, researchers and/or scientists from Brazil and the whole world (I received positive feedback on this from many people who received this email list; there is the name of each one of them in this post) highlighting the importance of having in the world a strong connection between University Departments for more efficient communication between people in various aspects, for example, to improve the work of the people involved and consequently, improve research and scientific projects in the World). It was an extremely difficult job, there were two cases of very competent professors, doctors, scientists and/or researchers in the area who informed me (one informed me the cell phone number by email so that I could call him after he had read the email sent to him containing the email list and the other doctor informed me on his office during a medical consultation that it would be good if you filed a patent on these email lists because the project was very good, however, for financial reasons, I decided not to trigger the patenting process. On this same subject, I received an excellent feedback from the email President@ucop.edu about the email list (Project) I made in 2015, I just don’t know the name of the person who emailed me a while ago, letting me know which would file the project in the UCLA database (University of California at Los Angeles, where the first Internet connection took place; The Internet was created in 1969, in the United States. Called Arpanet, it had the function of interconnecting laboratories That year, a professor at the University of California passed the first e-mail in history to a friend at Stanford. This network belonged to the US Department of Defense). I received a job offer from the UCLA Library via email around this time, but I didn’t want to take any chances. http://www.library.ucla.edu/contact I left this list of emails from 2015 on a blog I had durant a time (I don’t remember exactly the time) for anyone to download. Observation: This 2015 mailing list I did was more related to the Biological Sciences Area. Very Important Note: I did not earn any money with this project (2015) nor with my blog. I did not ask permission to each person who I put the e-mail in the e-mail list I did in 2015. So, I informed it to people linked to American and Brazilian govern, many professors, scientists and/or researchers to not cause any problem for me not for anyone years ago. @ https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states +1 (305) 257-9442 +34 910 782 483 contact@igerent.com http://www.google.com http://www.usa.gov https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ https://go.usa.gov/contactus president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov go.usa.gov@gsa.gov #Team #laws #Possibilities #supositions #suposições #ManyProbabilies #SoMuchMoney #MuitasProbabilidades #Facts #Fatos #MuitoDinheiro #EmailLists #feelings #actions #questions #sources #fontes #origin #Origem #Reading #leitura #EmailMessage #MensagemNoEmail #Internet #decisions #FastActionByEmail #City #Country #researchers #professors #scientists #students #govern #USA #CIA #FBI #VeryHardWork #WorldHistory #InternetHistory #pionners #contributions #lives #pionner #information #knowledge #article #articles #journals #television #radio #Internet #magazines #researches #ideas #energy #cell #DNA #websites #blogs #links #videos #images #Universities #Faculties #schools #TopResearchCenters #World #countries #cities #diffusion #SocialNetworks #DifferentPrices #PreçosDiferentes #money #prices #teams #investigations #analysis #authorities #Consequences #EmailMessages #consequências #possiblidades #HumanRights #DireitosHumanos #project #projects #patent #patentes #Confirmation #country #equipe #equipes #time #tempo #times #tempos #probabilities #probabilidades #person #people #pessoas #pessoa #E-mailMessages #health #life @ http://www.usa.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.fbi.gov http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.forbes.com http://www.nasa.gov http://www.ucla.edu http://www.harvard.edu http://www.mit.edu http://www.stanford.edu http://www.columbia.edu http://www.stripe.com https://www.cam.ac.uk/ https://www.ox.ac.uk/ http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nejm.com http://www.nature.com https://ki.se/ http://www.yale.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.duke.edu @ A interação entre diferentes Departamentos é muito importante, incluindo os mesmos tipos de Departamentos só que de diferentes Centros de Pesquisa nas diversas partes do mundo. The Interaction between different Departments is very important, including the same types of Departments but from different Research Centers in different parts of the world https://www.ucop.edu/ https://www.library.ucla.edu/biomed/staff. Se alguém quiser usar as listas de e-mails que fiz em 2022, a pessoa terá que enviar e-mail pedindo, se possível, para o(s) seguinte(s) endereço(s) de email(s) enviar a lista de emails. Como muitos já sabem, a Internet teve origem nos EUA e NUNCA quero me prejudicar com estas listas de emails financeiramente nem psicologicamente por alguém. Foi um trabalho muito difícil fazê-la, podendo ser muito útil para a Comunidade Científica Mundial nos vários setores da sociedade mundial. Observação muito importante: Enviei ontem (07/01/2023) para estes endereços de e-mails chancellor@ucla.edu president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov president@ucop.edu go.usa.gov@gsa.gov nimhinfo@nih.gov nhgripressoffice@mail.nih.gov e hoje (08/01/20230) p/ vice.president@whitehouse.gov comments@whitehouse.gov o link da planilha Google que tenho na qual está a lista de e-mails que fiz em 2022. Esta lista de e-mails está relacionada à grande quantidade de pessoas ligadas diretamente com Excelentes Centros de Pesquisa e Ensino do Mundo e a descrição do assunto da mensagem do e-mail. NÃO quero me prejudicar JAMAIS em NENHUM aspecto financeiramente nem de outra forma, como por exemplo, um professor, pesquisador e/ou cientista ficar indignado com quem fez a lista de e-mails (no meu caso) sem a permissão dele, mesmo não havendo motivo para acionar a Lei de Proteção de Dados Pessoais e outras Leis relacionadas ao assunto contra uma outra pessoa (sem ser eu) que usou a lista de e-mails que fiz fazendo com que esta pessoa pague uma multa de um determinada quantia de dinheiro. Como muitas pessoas já sabem, há leis no mundo muito rígidas que envolvem muito dinheiro de multa sobre esse assunto. Observação muito importante: Houve uma situação em que uma pessoa não gostou nem um pouco de eu ter colocado o e-mail dele na lista de e-mails que fiz e depois ter enviado e-mail pra ele, pedindo para eu tirar o e-mail dele imediatamente na lista de e-mails que fiz, mesmo eu não ter informado pra ele que eu fiz uma lista de e-mails. Em todos os casos em que as pessoas me pediram para eu retirar o e-mail deles nos meus contatos para eu não enviar mais e-mail para eles e nos outros casos em que enviei emails para outras pessoas usando a lista que fiz, não informei que eu tinha feito uma lista de e-mails. Teve alguns casos em que algumas pessoas me informaram para eu retirar o nome delas na lista de e-mails que fiz, mesmo eu não ter informado isso pra elas, e nenhuma destas pessoas quiseram saber sobre a lista de e-mails que fiz. Muitas pessoas têm me pedido para eu não enviar mais e-mail (Cancelar Subscrição). Observação Muito Importante: Uma extensa lista de e-mails que fiz em 2015 (pouco mais de 32 mil e-mails cadastrados) relacionada à pesquisadores, professores e/ou cientistas das 20 Melhores Universidades do Mundo foi enviada junto com um Resumo do Projeto para uma grande quantidade de professores, pesquisadores e/ou cientistas do Brasil e do Mundo todo (recebi um retorno positivo sobre isso de muitas pessoas que receberam esta lista de e-mail; há o nome de cada uma delas neste post) ressaltando a importância de haver no Mundo uma forte ligação entre os Departamentos das Universidades para uma comunicação mais eficiente entre as pessoas em vários aspectos, por exemplo, para melhorar o trabalho das pessoas envolvidas e consequentemente, melhorar as pesquisas e projetos científicos no Mundo). Foi um trabalho extremamente difícil, houveram dois casos de professores, médicos, cientistas e/ou pesquisadores muito competentes na área que me informaram (um me informou o número de celular por e-mail para eu ligar pra ele após ele ter lido o e-mail enviado à ele contendo a lista de e-mails e o outro médico me informou no seu consultório durante uma consulta médica) que seria bom que fizesse uma patente sobre essas listas de e-mails porque o projeto era muito bom, porém, por questões financeiras, decidi não acionar o processo de patenteamento. Sobre este mesmo assunto, recebi um excelente feedback por parte do e-mail President@ucop.edu sobre a lista (Projeto) que fiz em 2015; só não sei o nome da pessoa que enviou e-mail pra mim há um tempo atrás, informando-me que iria arquivar o projeto no banco de dados da UCLA (Universidade da Califórnia em Los Angeles, local onde ocorreu a 1ª conexão em rede da Internet; A internet foi criada em 1969, nos Estados Unidos. Chamada de Arpanet, tinha como função interligar laboratórios de pesquisa. Naquele ano, um professor da Universidade da Califórnia passou para um amigo em Stanford o primeiro e-mail da história. Essa rede pertencia ao Departamento de Defesa norte-americano). Recebi por e-mail uma proposta de trabalho por parte da Biblioteca da UCLA (UCLA Library) nessa época, mas não quis me arriscar. http://www.library.ucla.edu/contact Deixei por um tempo (não me lembro exatamente o tempo) essa lista de e-mails de 2015 num blog que eu tinha para qualquer um fazer download. Observação: Esta lista de e-mails de 2015 era mais relacionada à Área de Ciências Biológicas. Observação Muito Importante: Não ganhei nenhum dinheiro com este projeto (2015) e nem com meu blog. @ https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states +1 (305) 257-9442 +34 910 782 483 contact@igerent.com http://www.google.com http://www.usa.gov https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ https://go.usa.gov/contactus president@whitehouse.gov #Team #laws #Possibilities #supositions #suposições #ManyProbabilies #SoMuchMoney #MuitasProbabilidades #Facts #Fatos #MuitoDinheiro #EmailLists #feelings #actions #questions #sources #fontes #origin #Origem #Reading #leitura #EmailMessage #MensagemNoEmail #Internet #decisions #FastActionByEmail #City #Country #researchers #professors #scientists #students #govern #USA #CIA #FBI #VeryHardWork #WorldHistory #InternetHistory #pionners #contributions #lives #pionner #information #knowledge #article #articles #journals #television #radio #Internet #magazines #researches #ideas #energy #cell #DNA #websites #blogs #links #videos #images #Universities #Faculties #schools #TopResearchCenters #World #countries #cities #diffusion #SocialNetworks #DifferentPrices #PreçosDiferentes #money #prices #teams #investigations #analysis #authorities #Consequences #EmailMessages #consequências #possiblidades #HumanRights #DireitosHumanos #project #projects #patent #patentes #Confirmation #country #equipe #equipes #time #tempo #times #tempos #probabilities #probabilidades #person #people #pessoas #pessoa #E-mailMessages #health #life @ http://www.usa.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.fbi.gov http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.forbes.com http://www.nasa.gov http://www.ucla.edu http://www.harvard.edu http://www.mit.edu http://www.stanford.edu http://www.columbia.edu http://www.stripe.com https://www.cam.ac.uk/ https://www.ox.ac.uk/ http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nejm.com http://www.nature.com https://ki.se/ http://www.yale.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.duke.edu @ A interação entre diferentes Departamentos é muito importante, incluindo os mesmos tipos de Departamentos só que de diferentes Centros de Pesquisa nas diversas partes do mundo. The Interaction between different Departments is very important, including the same types of Departments but from different Research Centers in different parts of the world https://www.ucop.edu/ https://www.library.ucla.edu/biomed/staff https://chancellor.ucla.edu/contact-us/ https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/about-us/leadership https://chancellor.ucla.edu/about/ https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/organization/gsa-leadership-directory?gsaredirect=leadershipdirectory https://www.nih.gov/include-project/contact https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-institute-center-contact-information https://www.genome.gov/about-nhgri/Contact https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ Esta lista de e-mails está relacionada à grande quantidade de pessoas ligadas diretamente com Excelentes Centros de Pesquisa e Ensino do Mundo e a descrição do assunto para estes endereços de e-mails: chancellor@ucla.edu president@whitehouse.gov vice_president@whitehouse.gov president@ucop.edu go.usa.gov@gsa.gov nimhinfo@nih.gov nhgripressoffice@mail.nih.gov vice.president@whitehouse.gov comments@whitehouse.gov. NÃO quero me prejudicar JAMAIS em NENHUM aspecto financeiramente nem de outra forma, como por exemplo, um professor, pesquisador e/ou cientista ficar indignado com quem fez a lista de e-mails (no meu caso) sem a permissão dele, mesmo não havendo motivo para acionar a Lei de Proteção de Dados Pessoais e outras Leis relacionadas ao assunto contra uma outra pessoa (sem ser eu) que usou a lista de e-mails que fiz fazendo com que esta pessoa pague uma multa de um determinada quantia de dinheiro. Como muitas pessoas já sabem, há leis no mundo muito rígidas que envolvem muito dinheiro de multa sobre esse assunto. Observação muito importante: Houve uma situação em que uma pessoa não gostou nem um pouco de eu ter colocado o e-mail dele na lista de e-mails que fiz e depois ter enviado e-mail pra ele, pedindo para eu tirar o e-mail dele imediatamente na lista de e-mails que fiz, mesmo eu não ter informado pra ele que eu fiz uma lista de e-mails. Em todos os casos em que as pessoas me pediram para eu retirar o e-mail deles nos meus contatos para eu não enviar mais e-mail para eles e nos outros casos em que enviei emails para outras pessoas usando a lista que fiz, não informei que eu tinha feito uma lista de e-mails. Teve alguns casos em que algumas pessoas me informaram para eu retirar o nome delas na lista de e-mails que fiz, mesmo eu não ter informado isso pra elas, e nenhuma destas pessoas quiseram saber sobre a lista de e-mails que fiz. Muitas pessoas têm me pedido para eu não enviar mais e-mail (Cancelar Subscrição). Observação Muito Importante: Uma extensa lista de e-mails que fiz em 2015 (pouco mais de 32 mil e-mails cadastrados) relacionada à pesquisadores, professores e/ou cientistas das 20 Melhores Universidades do Mundo foi enviada junto com um Resumo do Projeto para uma grande quantidade de professores, pesquisadores e/ou cientistas do Brasil e do Mundo todo (recebi um retorno positivo sobre isso de muitas pessoas que receberam esta lista de e-mail; há o nome de cada uma delas neste post) ressaltando a importância de haver no Mundo uma forte ligação entre os Departamentos das Universidades para uma comunicação mais eficiente entre as pessoas em vários aspectos, por exemplo, para melhorar o trabalho das pessoas envolvidas e consequentemente, melhorar as pesquisas e projetos científicos no Mundo). Foi um trabalho extremamente difícil, houveram dois casos de professores, médicos, cientistas e/ou pesquisadores muito competentes na área que me informaram (um me informou o número de celular por e-mail para eu ligar pra ele após ele ter lido o e-mail enviado à ele contendo a lista de e-mails e o outro médico me informou no seu consultório durante uma consulta médica) que seria bom que fizesse uma patente sobre essas listas de e-mails porque o projeto era muito bom, porém, por questões financeiras, decidi não acionar o processo de patenteamento. Sobre este mesmo assunto, recebi um excelente feedback por parte do e-mail President@ucop.edu sobre a lista (Projeto) que fiz em 2015; só não sei o nome da pessoa que enviou e-mail pra mim há um tempo atrás, informando-me que iria arquivar o projeto no banco de dados da UCLA (Universidade da Califórnia em Los Angeles, local onde ocorreu a 1ª conexão em rede da Internet; A internet foi criada em 1969, nos Estados Unidos. Chamada de Arpanet, tinha como função interligar laboratórios de pesquisa. Naquele ano, um professor da Universidade da Califórnia passou para um amigo em Stanford o primeiro e-mail da história. Essa rede pertencia ao Departamento de Defesa norte-americano). Recebi por e-mail uma proposta de trabalho por parte da Biblioteca da UCLA (UCLA Library) nessa época, mas não quis me arriscar. http://www.library.ucla.edu/contact Deixei por um tempo (não me lembro exatamente o tempo) essa lista de e-mails de 2015 num blog que eu tinha para qualquer um fazer download. Observação: Esta lista de e-mails de 2015 era mais relacionada à Área de Ciências Biológicas. Observação Muito Importante: Não ganhei nenhum dinheiro com este projeto (2015) e nem com meu blog. @ https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states +1 (305) 257-9442 +34 910 782 483 contact@igerent.com http://www.google.com http://www.usa.gov https://www.whitehouse.gov/contact/ https://go.usa.gov/contactus president@whitehouse.gov #Team #laws #Possibilities #supositions #suposições #ManyProbabilies #SoMuchMoney #MuitasProbabilidades #Facts #Fatos #MuitoDinheiro #EmailLists #feelings #actions #questions #sources #fontes #origin #Origem #Reading #leitura #EmailMessage #MensagemNoEmail #Internet #decisions #FastActionByEmail #City #Country #researchers #professors #scientists #students #govern #USA #CIA #FBI #VeryHardWork #WorldHistory #InternetHistory #pionners #contributions #lives #pionner #information #knowledge #article #articles #journals #television #radio #Internet #magazines #researches #ideas #energy #cell #DNA #websites #blogs #links #videos #images #Universities #Faculties #schools #TopResearchCenters #World #countries #cities #diffusion #SocialNetworks #DifferentPrices #PreçosDiferentes #money #prices #teams #investigations #analysis #authorities #Consequences #EmailMessages #consequências #possiblidades #HumanRights #DireitosHumanos #project #projects #patent #patentes #Confirmation #country #equipe #equipes #time #tempo #times #tempos #probabilities #probabilidades #person #people #pessoas #pessoa #E-mailMessages #health #life @ http://www.usa.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.fbi.gov http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.forbes.com http://www.nasa.gov http://www.ucla.edu http://www.harvard.edu http://www.mit.edu http://www.stanford.edu http://www.columbia.edu http://www.stripe.com https://www.cam.ac.uk/ https://www.ox.ac.uk/ http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nejm.com http://www.nature.com https://ki.se/ http://www.yale.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.duke.edu @ A interação entre diferentes Departamentos é muito importante, incluindo os mesmos tipos de Departamentos só que de diferentes Centros de Pesquisa nas diversas partes do mundo. The Interaction between different Departments is very important, including the same types of Departments but from different Research Centers in different parts of the world https://www.ucop.edu/ https://www.library.ucla.edu/biomed/staff https://chancellor.ucla.edu/contact-us/ https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/about-us/leadership https://chancellor.ucla.edu/about/ https://www.gsa.gov/about-us/organization/gsa-leadership-directory?gsaredirect=leadershipdirectory https://www.nih.gov/include-project/contact https://www.nih.gov/institutes-nih/nih-institute-center-contact-information https://www.genome.gov/about-nhgri/Contact
http://www.fbi.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.usa.gov http://www.forbes.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.youtube.com http://www.nih.gov http://www.genome.gov http://www.google.com http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com #probability #energy #life #health #reading #team #time #equipe #investigations #investigações #pesquisa #research #longevidade #memória #memory #longevity #feelings #sentimentos #actions #vida #saúde #law #direito
Blog I started to do in 2018: http://www.science1984.wordpress.com My intentions were and always will be to help people in some way for a better world. https://science1984.wordpress.com/2022/10/18/goals-of-this-blog-objetivos-deste-blog-top-technologies-https-en-wikipedia-org-wiki-human_brain-https-en-wikipedia-org-wiki-mind-https-en-wikipedia-org-wiki-memory/ Very Important Notes: I don´t earn any money from this blog. This blog statistics about 2018 are not entirely from real people. If possible, visit and share my blog and inform to your friends to do the same to do a very big dissemination of my blog. Thanks in advance!! Best wishes for you always !! Thank you again!! #probabilities #reader #person #people #country
https://science1984.wordpress.com/?s=Positive+feedbacks
https://science1984.wordpress.com/?s=Oxford+union
I did other e-mail lists in this year (2022) and a little amount (comparing with the total number of e-mails cataloged) of excellent researchers, professors and/or scientists worldwide informed me to unsubscribe them. Note: I didn’t ask permission from each of them to put their e-mail on the e-mail lists. Very few of them asked me by e-mail about it (no permission to put their e-mail in the e-mail list) and informed me to unsubscribe them. They didn´t inform me to send the e-mail lists I did to them and they didn´t know about the e-mail list I did nor details about these e-mail lists I did like extension of it, for example. I know there´re strict laws in this subject related to money. The yahoo and gmail team has all these e-mail lists in the system and all these data are related to USA Government, of course. Very Important Note: I do not earn any money from this blog. I NEVER want to harm myself with this e-mail lists I made and NEITHER does anyone else. I do want to help people improve this world we live in ALWAYS anyway. @ NÃO quero me prejudicar NUNCA com esta lista de emails que fiz e NEM outra(s) pessoa(s). & The human expectancy of life needs to increase so much faster by more efficient projects and researches resulting in new drugs, vaccines, medical devices, therapeutic substances and others ´´things´´. The diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and prevention methods of diseases need to improve so much faster in the world, of course, to people live better and longer, more and more. The interactions among Research Centers Departments in the world is very important in many aspects, for example. It was very difficult to do these email lists. As many know, there are many probabilities that certain facts will occur, even surprisingly and unexpectedly by the people and/or people involved in the Internet. In addition, there are very strict laws in the world regarding about it and that involve fines of a lot of money. It really is a very delicate matter that requires a lot of attention. # @ AmericanGovern # authorities # & probabilities #forever #time # probabilities # friends # friend #family #e-mail #reader # people #reading # person # intentions #innovations #graphics #data #information #knowledge # blog #@ documents #HumanLongevity # feelings # law #countries # subject # content # Science # & World Scientific Community @ For a better world ALWAYS. Few people informed to me unsubscribe them. I am know the there are @ E-mails – Professors, Scientists and/or Researchers – Excellent Research Centers of the World @ Law – Direito – World – Mundo – Money – Dinheiro – Prices – Preço(s) – Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD) – USA GOVERN – USA AUTHORITIES – DETAILED INVESTIGATIONS – TEAM – COUNTRY – COUNTRIES – PROBABILITIES – POSSIBILITIES & USAPresident – USAGovern – USAAuthorities – Detailed Investigations – Intentions – Work – Blog – Data – Knowledge – Information – IndeterminedTime #Law #laws #signature #signatures #SoManyPossibilities #PERSON #Feelings – Health – Medicine – workers – actions – decisions – authorizations – unsubscribes – respect – Very Big Consequences – World – Times – Time – reading – spam – e-mails – content – level of importance of the message – email – emails – subjects 0 human longevity – analysis of the content and level of importance of the spam – authorities – detailed analysis – longevity @ $# energies – cell – dna – rna – human health #PEOPLE #EmailLists #Money #price #probabilities #TrueFacts #supositions #friends #family #InfinitePossibilities #HumanRights #REFLECTIONS #USA #Brazil #worry #origin #InternetHistory#future #present #past #WorldHistory #ComputerHistory #CellPhoneHistory #lives #VeryHardWork #OtherCountries #AUTHORITIES #Economy #cities #globalization #capitalism #velocity #times #Time #vision #listen #reading #typing #speaking #OtherPerson #OtherPeople #FalseFacts #FakeNews #SocialNetworks #websites #blogs #Intentions – blog – spam – Scientific Community – World Innovations – graphics and data – unknown diseases / fatal diseases – rare diseases @ -> lack of understanding of many diseases – genetics – physiology – Nobel prizes – Other prizes – motivation – posters – articles – references – new ideas – age – ages – life – death – world – & @ human life of expectancy #DifferentPossibilities #DifferentCommunication #feelings #mind #thinking #fact #PossibleFacts #patents #speaking #email #projects #communication #researches #blog #data #RelevantInformation #RelevantKnowledge #RelevantSources #RealStatistics #Science @ World University Rankings – World History – Country – Inventions – Investigations – E-mails – Patent – Money – USA Govern – Law – Blog – Website – Social Networks – Work – Price – Probability – Person – People – Internet Pionner – Pionners – Reference – Subjects – Lives – Life – Human Longevity – Age – Ages – Graphics – Cell – DNA – Data – Information – Knowledge – Internet Society https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states +1 (305) 257-9442 +34 910 782 483 contact@igerent.com http://www.google.com http://www.usa.gov
Sharing interesting and important information is a very important act because it helps in the diffusion of them in the world. Of course, it has to be true and not fake news. #sincerity #sinceridade #probabilities #probabilidades #website #site #link #Internet #socialnetworks #videos #photos #images #technologies #reasons #motivos #content #conteúdo #people #pessoas #person #pessoa #intentions #intenções #crimes #improvement #melhoria #memory #message #mensagem #chat #name #nick #nicks #time #tempo #economy #economia #tempo #dinheiro #money #price #preço #levelofimportance #níveldeimportância #numberofpeople #númerodepessoas #mente #mind #velocity #velocidade #patrocinadores #sponsors #law #direito #respect #respeito #vida #life #saúde #health #actions #ações #investigations #investigações #estímulo #motivation #otherperson #otherpeople #outrapessoa #outraspessoas #wikipedia #team #equipe #family #família #amigo #amigos #friend #friends #diferentestiposdepessoas #differenttypesofpeople #Longevity #longevidade #memories #memórias #fala #speak #escrita #writing #typing #digitação #worldhistory #históriadomundo #país #country #countries #países #sitemuitoconhecido #manypeopleknowthiswwebsite #email #emails #mensagens #messages #leitura #reading #probabilidades #probabilities #intentions #goals #idade #idades #age #ages #questions #affirmations #pergunta #futureimaginations #imaginaçõesfuturas #imaginações #imaginations #perguntas #assunto #subject #cidade #city #afirmações #objetivos #trabalho #work #site #chat #lackofrespecttome #futuro #future #faltaderespeitocomigo #lackofrespect #futurosencontros #futuroencontro #futuremeeting #futuremeetings #statistics #estatísticas #website #Brazil #ranking #world #mundo #USA #EUA #OtherCountries #USAAuthorities #USAPolice #BetterWebsite #BetterChat #mentalhealthofotherpeople #saúdementaldeoutraspessoas #faltaderespeito #humanlongevity #longevidadehumana #pensamentodeoutrapessoa #conselho #advice #links #pensamentosdeoutraspessoas #thinkingofotherperson #thoughtsofotherperson #thoughtsofotherpeople #leitordemente #mindreading #muitodesrespeito #faladeoutrapessoa #otherpersonspeaking #faladeoutraspessoas #speakingofotherpeople #InternetPionners #vídeosdainternettotalmenteinapropriados #totallyinappropriateinternetvideos #description #descrição #induçãodeacoeserradas #inductionsofwrongactions #leiturademeail #emailreading #analysis #análise #pioneiros #contributions #InternetSociety #InternetAuthorities ##contribuições #sociedade #society #betterworld #mundomelhor #differenttechnologies #diferentestecnologias
http://www.usa.gov http://www.cia.gov http://www.fbi.gov http://www.gmail.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.google.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.wordpress.com http://www.cnn.com http://www.bloomberg.com http://www.bbc.com http://www.forbes.com http://www.nasa.gov http://www.ucla.edu http://www.harvard.edu http://www.mit.edu http://www.stanford.edu http://www.columbia.edu http://www.stripe.com https://www.cam.ac.uk/ https://www.ox.ac.uk/ http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nejm.com http://www.nature.com https://ki.se/ http://www.yale.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.duke.edu
List of people who gave me a positive feedback by e-mail about an excellent, detailed and very extensive e-mail list I did in 2015 from 20 Best Universities of the World. This e-mail list is more related to the Area of Biological Sciences. I sent it to a very big amount of excellent professors, scientists and/or researchers of Brazil and other countries of the world. a summary about this Project (e-mail list) was sent too to them. @ YouTube Videos – Very important information about the e-mail list I did in 2015 – Over 32,000 e-mails of researchers were cataloged manually by me – It was a very hard work @ Very Important Note: I did not earn any money with this project nor with this blog. My intentions are only help professors, researchers and scientists in anyway. As many people know, the interactions among Academic DEpartments are very important to the world progress. So, these interactions among people need to be very efficient and faster, of course. & Inside the Living Cell & Gene Silencing by microRNAs @ Immunology of the Lung & How the Digestive System Works & Kidney anatomy @ Bladder Anatomy & Day in the life – Neurosurgeon on call & HOW TO DEVELOP REAL LIFE SUPERPOWERS | UNLEASHING THE SUBCONSCIOUS MIND @ After watching this, your brain will not be the same | Lara Boyd | TEDxVancouver @ The Power of the Human Mind – Motivational Video by Eddie Pinero & OWN YOUR MIND – Best Motivational Video & The Most Amazing Facts About The Human Brain & Suzana Herculano-Houzel: O que o cérebro humano tem de tão especial? @ Nobel Minds 2019 & Nobel Minds 2018 & Nobel Minds 2017 @ ´´The Nobel Prize is considered the most prestigious award in the world. Prize-winning discoveries include X-rays, radioactivity and penicillin.´´https://sweden.se/society/the-nobel-prize-awarding-great-minds/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/facts/nobel-prize-facts/ @& # TIME #INTERNET #ACCESS #SHARE # INFORMATION # INTENTIONS # SPEAK #TYPE #WRITE # READ # DIFFUSION OF KNOWLEDGEMENT # SCIENTIFIC DISCOVERIES # RESEARCHES # REFERENCES # CITATIONS # IMPACT # LONGEVITY # PEOPLE # PERSON # AGE # AGES # INNOVATION # GRAPHICS # WORK # ANIMAL TESTING # HUMAN TEST # ANALYSIS # NAME # DISEASE # HEALTH # DNA #CELL # MONEY # INVESTMENTS # COUNTRIES # WORLD @ VERY IMPORTANT WEBSITES, LINKS, SOCIAL NETWORKS, VIDEOS AND IMAGES & I did other email lists in this year (2022) and a little amount of excellent researchers, professors and scientists informed me to unsubscribe them even though I didn’t ask permission from each of them to put their e-mail on the e-mail lists. Very few of them asked me by e-mail about it (no permission to put their e-mail in the e-mail list) and informed me to unsubscribe them. They didn´t inform me to send the e-mail lists I did to them and they didn´t know details about these e-mail lists I did like extension of it, for example. I know there´re strict laws in this subject related to money. The yahoo and gmail team has all these e-mail lists in the system and all these data are related to USA Government, of course. Very Important Note: I do not earn any money from this blog. I NEVER want to harm myself with this e-mail listS I made and NEITHER does anyone else. I do want to help people improve this world we live in ALWAYS anyway. NÃO quero me prejudicar NUNCA com esta lista de emails que fiz e NEM outra(s) pessoa(s). @ The human expectancy of life needs to increase so much faster by more efficient projects and researches resulting in new drugs, vaccines, medical devices, therapeutic substances and others ´´things´´. The diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and prevention methods of diseases need to improve so much faster in the world, of course, to people live better and longer, more and more. The interactions among Research Centers Departments in the world is very important in many aspects, for example. It was very difficult to do these email lists. As many know, there are many probabilities that certain facts will occur, even surprisingly and unexpectedly by the people and/or people involved in the Internet. In addition, there are very strict laws in the world regarding about it and that involve fines of a lot of money. It really is a very delicate matter that requires a lot of attention. # @ AmericanGovern # authorities # & probabilities #forever #time # probabilities # friends # friend #family #e-mail #reader # people #reading # person # intentions #innovations #graphics #data #information #knowledge # blog #@ documents #HumanLongevity # feelings # law #countries # subject # content # Science # & World Scientific Community @ For a better world ALWAYS. Few people informed to me unsubscribe them. I am know the there are @ E-mails – Professors, Scientists and/or Researchers – Excellent Research Centers of the World @ Law – Direito – World – Mundo – Money – Dinheiro – Prices – Preço(s) – Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD) – USA GOVERN – USA AUTHORITIES – DETAILED INVESTIGATIONS – TEAM – COUNTRY – COUNTRIES – PROBABILITIES – POSSIBILITIES & USAPresident – USAGovern – USAAuthorities – Detailed Investigations – Intentions – Work – Blog – Data – Knowledge – Information – IndeterminedTime #Law #laws #signature #signatures #SoManyPossibilities #PERSON #Feelings – Health – Medicine – workers – actions – decisions – authorizations – unsubscribes – respect – Very Big Consequences – World – Times – Time – reading – spam – e-mails – content – level of importance of the message – email – emails – subjects 0 human longevity – analysis of the content and level of importance of the spam – authorities – detailed analysis – longevity @ $# energies – cell – dna – rna – human health #PEOPLE #EmailLists #Money #price #probabilities #TrueFacts #supositions #friends #family #InfinitePossibilities #HumanRights #REFLECTIONS #USA #Brazil #worry #origin #InternetHistory#future #present #past #WorldHistory #ComputerHistory #CellPhoneHistory #lives #VeryHardWork #OtherCountries #AUTHORITIES #Economy #cities #globalization #capitalism #velocity #times #Time #vision #listen #reading #typing #speaking #OtherPerson #OtherPeople #FalseFacts #FakeNews #SocialNetworks #websites #blogs #Intentions – blog – spam – Scientific Community – World Innovations – graphics and data – unknown diseases / fatal diseases – rare diseases @ -> lack of understanding of many diseases – genetics – physiology – Nobel prizes – Other prizes – motivation – posters – articles – references – new ideas – age – ages – life – death – world – & @ human life of expectancy #DifferentPossibilities #DifferentCommunication #feelings #mind #thinking #fact #PossibleFacts #patents #speaking #email #projects #communication #researches #blog #data #RelevantInformation #RelevantKnowledge #RelevantSources #RealStatistics #Science @ World University Rankings – World History – Country – Inventions – Investigations – E-mails – Patent – Money – USA Govern – Law – Blog – Website – Social Networks – Work – Price – Probability – Person – People – Internet Pionner – Pionners – Reference – Subjects – Lives – Life – Human Longevity – Age – Ages – Graphics – Cell – DNA – Data – Information – Knowledge – Internet Society https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/u-s-patent-and-trademark-office https://igerent.com/trademark-registration-united-states +1 (305) 257-9442 +34 910 782 483 contact@igerent.com http://www.google.com http://www.usa.gov
http://www.alliedacademies.org/journal-clinical-research-pharmacy/
https://dms.creighton.edu/sites/default/files/faculty-cv-files/CV_Rank%20and%20Tenure%20Dossier_Harsh%20Chauhan.pdf
http://www.alliedacademies.org/journal-clinical-research-pharmacy/
Nanomedicine123(2)57
Nanomedicina –> Texto que redigi. Nanomedicine –> Text I typed
LISTA DE NOMES – PEOPLE´S NAMES – E-MAIL LIST – LISTA DE E-MAILS-converted – People´s names who liked of the e-mail list I did in 2015 and sent a positive feedback to me by e-mail. Nome das pessoas que gostaram da lista de e-mails que fiz em 2015 e me enviaram um feedback positivo pra mim pelo e-mail.
Obs: Recebi um ótimo feedback positivo do e-mail President@ucop.edu
sobre a lista (Projeto) que fiz em 2015, só não sei o nome da pessoa que
enviou e-mail pra mim há um tempo atrás, informando-me que iria
arquivar o projeto no banco de dados da UCLA. Recebi proposta pra
trabalhar com a UCLA Library nessa época mas não quis me arriscar.
http://www.library.ucla.edu/contact
Note: I received a great positive feedback from the e-mail
President@ucop.edu about the list (Project) I made in 2015, I just do not
know the name of the person who sent me e-mail a while ago, informing
me that the UCLA would file the project in the UCLA database. I
received a proposal to work with the UCLA Library at this time but did
not want to risk it. http://www.library.ucla.edu/biomed
– I did not ask permission to each person who I put the e-mail in the e-mail list. So, I informed it to people linked to American and Brazilian govern, many professors, scientists and/or researchers to do not cause problems for me not for anyone.
– I deleted the e-mail from email list of person who asked me to delete it (very few people) by e-mail. I know that I did a very good work because many excellent people worldwide gave me a positive feedback about email list I did by e-mail. These important data are available in this blog.
– Nunca ganhei nenhum dinheiro com a lista de e-mails que fiz em 2015.
Fazer a lista de e-mails foi um trabalho muito difícil.
-Foram catalogados mais de 32.000 e-mail de pesquisadores.
- A little more than 32000 e-mails of researchers were cataloged.
-It was a very hard work to do the e-mail list.
– I did not earn any money from the e-mail list I did in 2015.
I did a summary about the project and I sent to researchers by e-mail.
Fiz um resumo do projeto e enviei p/ os pesquisadores por e-mail.
– Information about the email list I made in 2015 is already very well informed by Internet for many people to do not to cause any problems for me or someone. I did a lot of complicated and detailed things about this subject in the intention of only help in any way professors and researchers of different countries, for example.
– I do not want to harm anyone and not be harmed by this blog I made, extensive and detailed e-mail list about researchers from 20 best universities of the world in 2015, ´´my´´ YouTube channel and other things. My objective is help anyone like researcher, professor, student or other person and people of any way with this blog and YouTube channel, for example. #time #technology #history #health #money #world #innovation #science #life #country #research
– Falei sobre o que fiz à respeito da lista de e-mails que fiz em 2015 relacionada à pesquisadores e professores das 20 melhores instituições de ensino e pesquisa do mundo. Excelentes pesquisadores e professores gostaram da lista de e-mails que fiz, o que mostra que fiz um ótimo trabalho (coloquei o nome deles neste blog).
– Informei que não pedi autorização para cada pessoa na qual coloquei o e-mail na lista de e-mails e que informei por e-mail esse fato para pessoas ligadas ao governo brasileiro e americano e para muitos professores, pesquisadores para não causar problemas pra mim nem pra outra pessoa.
– Deletei o e-mail de quem me pediu para deletar na lista (pouquíssimas pessoas) por meio do e-mail.
Click to access CV_Rank%20and%20Tenure%20Dossier_Harsh%20Chauhan.pdf
Twitter message for me from my Twitter follower: Clinical Res. Pharm. -> @ResPharm´´Hello… Nice to hear about that.. Let me introduce myself first.. I am Chauhan H Managing Editor of Journal of Clinical Research and Pahrmacy.. We do publish research articles on Clinical Pharmacy. Do you have any article for Publication..? Clinical Res. Pharm. Waiting for your Positive Response. Clinical Res. Pharm. :)´´
https://dms.creighton.edu/sites/default/files/faculty-cv-files/CV_Rank%20and%20Tenure%20Dossier_Harsh%20Chauhan.pdf http://www.alliedacademies.org/journal-clinical-research-pharmacy/
– My Lattes Curriculum:
http://lattes.cnpq.br/5815016582806182
This blog content is very good with very high quality and importance to the national and world society. So many people from different countries have already visited it and liked it, such as renowned professors, researchers and scientists worldwide. I put a lot of positive feedback on this blog. I was invited through direct messages to participate as a speaker and other forms of several scientific events of high worldwide importance in a very short time because I participated in very important research in Brazil (´´my´´ monograph and ´´my ´´ dissertation). These invitations that were made to me are also on the blog, because as many know, the transparency of a website or blog is very important for people. Unfortunately, there are fake news on websites, social networks and blogs, for example. There is a lot of information and knowledge on this blog from very reliable sources. The dissemination of these information and knowledge is always essential for the progress of the country and the world. It was a very hard work to do, however, the most important and valuable thing is the recognition of all this work done by the people who access it. My intentions and objectives has always been and always will be to improve Brazil and the world in some way and/or in different ways with this blog, depending on who accesses it and in what field they work, for example. One of the main goals of this blog is to encourage scientific research; help professionals in the field with great information and knowledge, stimulating new ideas, projects and research; encourage people to do better scientific research, with more precision and details, even if there is no statistically significant difference in the results between certain parameters, as these aren´t results only because of that, and can stimulate new ideas on the part of professors, researchers, students, scientists and other people who work in the scientific area in carrying out new scientific works with different objectives and methodologies and/or focusing more in details like graphics comparisons in certain biological factors analysing certain factors like ages of the experimental animals and/or in humans in determined experimental time. Therefore, it´s relevant to show them to the Scientific Society in posters and scientific articles published in scientific journals, even with no statistically significant difference. The transparency of the results of a scientific work is always important. There´s an article published in 2019 in the Nature that inform this very important issue, stating that Science would be more difficult but better: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00874-8 It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance – Looking beyond a much used and abused measure would make science harder, but better. Sometimes, small details in the results of a research, totally overlooked by many and/or all of the team, can play an essential role in obtaining new Scientific Discoveries in the future. Science is closely linked to uncertainty, questions and doubts. On many occasions, in the most diverse laboratories of several countries, results appear totally unexpected by the entire team responsible for the experiment, becoming very valuable to the scientific community. Many already know that working in the scientific area is very complicated, including in financial terms, because in many cases, the Government does not encourage the person with a scholarship, for example. This blog is dedicated to Science, Technology and Innovation. As many already know, human life expectancy needs to increase a lot in a short time through more efficient research and scientific projects, resulting in new therapeutic substances, medicines, vaccines, medical devices, among others. Unfortunately, there are silent, fatal diseases and other types of diseases that have been very complicated for a long time, and that the Scientific Community cannot cure, prevent, or diagnose them too early to make a treatment and prognosis much faster and more efficient. For this and other reasons, of course, unfortunately, so many people end up dying daily in Brazil and in other countries. The scientific world urgently needs major innovations to obtain better results in scientific work, even if these works are very difficult to understand and carry out. Transparency and clarity of research results in scientific articles and scientific events is essential, as it encourages people to reflect on the subject, even though it is very difficult to understand and explain. Obviously, it is much better to show them to the Scientific Community, such as detailed graphics referring to different ages of mice in different groups of a research, being able to compare them on different parameters, taking into account that the mouse genetics is almost the same. to that of the human being related to the health- disease state. As is known, age is a very relevant factor in a person’s health-disease process, combined with other factors that are related to each other simultaneously, such as genetics, human physiology, biochemistry, existing comorbidities in the human body, among others. The world urgently needs much more efficient methods of diagnosis, prognosis and treatment in many cases, as well as medical devices, medicines, therapeutic substances, among others. With that, the human lifespan will increase significantly. It is worth mentioning that personalized medicine or precision medicine is very innovative and important, but as in many fields of Science, there are many gaps that need to be filled through much more effective research and projects. It is clear that theory does not always combine with practice, depending on the subject at hand, and the work of professionals in the area is very challenging, complex and complicated, even with great interactions between several teams from different countries, however, the benefits of such results achieved are much better and efficient. Observation: There´re people who are part of the Scientific Community who believe that in the future Human Physical Immortality can be achieved. If you can promote the blog it will be very important, of course. If everyone who accesses the blog and disseminates it, the result of these attitudes will be very significant in many aspects for national and global society. There is a lot of very important and innovative work done by others on the blog. Health and Peace to You and Others Always!! For a Better World Always!! #Law #Direito #Vida #Life #Health #Saúde #Authoriries #Autoridades #Investigations #Investigações #País #Country #City #Cidade #HumanLongevity #Idade(s) #Age #Ages #Future #Time #Respect #Respeito #Pessoa #Pessoas #Person #People #Internet #Data #HumanRights #DireitosHumanos #Team #Equipe #Govern #Governo #Probabilidade(s) #Probabilities #Probability #Fato #Fact #TypesOfCommunication #Energy #Energia#Universe #Universo #CreatorOfTheUniverse #CriadorDoUniverso #Name #Nome #ForABetterWorldAlways #ProteçãoDoMundoSempre #PorUmMundoMelhorSempre #TodasAsManeiras #AllWays #AllProbabilities #TodasProbabilidades #Situations #Situações #Fala #Speak #Listen #Escuta #Write #Escrita #Typing #Redigir #Read #Ler #Feelings #Sentimentos #Actions #Ações #Work #Trabalho #FutureGenerations #GeraçõesFuturas #Contributions #Contribuições #ScientificCommunity #ComunidadeCientífica
……………………………………………………………………………………………………
The human expectancy of life needs to increase so much faster by more efficient researches and projects. So, the World will have very efficient drugs, therapeutic substances, medical devices and vaccines, for example. Unfortunately there are fatal diseases in our World. The methods of prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of diseases are always fundamental to the human life. In many cases, these methods need to be so much better more and more by more efficient technologies.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00874-8
• EDITORIAL
• 20 March 2019
It’s time to talk about ditching
statistical significance
Looking beyond a much used and abused measure
would make science harder, but better.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9
COMMENT
20 March 2019
Scientists rise up against statistical significance
Valentin Amrhein, Sander Greenland, Blake McShane and more than 800 signatories call for an end to hyped claims and the dismissal of possibly crucial effects.
O conteúdo deste blog está muito bom com alta qualidade e importância p/ a sociedade nacional e mundial. Muitas pessoas de vários países já o acessaram e gostaram do mesmo, tais como renomados professores, pesquisadores e cientistas de várias partes do mundo. Coloquei muitos feedbacks positivos neste blog. Fui convidado por meio de mensagens diretas p/ participar como speaker e outras formas de vários eventos científicos de alta importância mundial em muito pouco tempo porque participei de pesquisas bem importantes no Brasil (´´minha´´ monografia e ´´minha´´ dissertação). Está no blog também estes convites que me foram feitos, pois como muitos sabem, a transparência de um site ou blog é muito importante p/ as pessoas. Infelizmente há fake news em sites, redes sociais e blogs, por exemplo. Há uma grande quantidade de informações e conhecimentos neste blog de fontes muito confiáveis. A difusão destas informações e conhecimentos sempre é essencial p/ o progresso do país e do mundo. Foi um trabalho muito árduo de fazê-lo, porém, o mais importante e valioso, é o reconhecimento de todo este trabalho feito pelas pessoas que o acessam. Minhas intenções e objetivos sempre foram e sempre serão de melhorar o Brasil e o mundo de alguma forma e/ou de várias formas com este blog, dependendo de quem o acessa e em que ramo trabalha, por exemplo. Um dos grandes objetivos deste blog é incentivar a realização da pesquisa científica; ajudar profissionais do ramo com ótimas informações e conhecimentos, estimulando novas ideias, projetos e pesquisas; incentivar as pessoas a fazerem uma melhor pesquisa científica, com mais precisão e detalhes, mesmo não havendo nos resultados uma diferença estatística significativa entre certos parâmetros, pois estes não deixam de ser resultados importantes apenas por isso, podendo estimular novas ideias por parte de professores, pesquisadores, alunos, cientistas e demais pessoas que atuam na área científica na realização de novos trabalhos científicos com objetivos e metodologias diferentes e/ou focando mais em detalhes como comparações gráficas em determinados fatores biológicos, analisando certos fatores, como idades dos animais experimentais e/ou em humanos durante um tempo experimental. Por isso, é relevante mostrá-los para a Sociedade Científica em pôsteres e artigos científicos publicados em revistas científicas, mesmo não havendo diferença estatística significativa. É sempre importante a transparência dos resultados de um trabalho científico. Há um artigo publicado na Revista Nature https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00874-8 que aborda este assunto bem relevante, informando que a Ciência ficaria mais difícil porém melhor: It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance – Looking beyond a much used and abused measure would make science harder, but better. Às vezes, pequenos detalhes nos resultados de uma pesquisa, menosprezados totalmente por muitos e/ou por todos da equipe, pode ter um papel essencial na obtenção de novas Descobertas Científicas futuramente. A Ciência está muito ligada à incerteza, questionamentos e dúvidas. Em muitas ocasiões, nos mais diversos laboratórios de vários países, surgem resultados totalmente inesperados por toda a equipe responsável do experimento, tornando-se muito valiosos pra comunidade científica. Muitos já sabem que trabalhar na área científica é bem complicado, incluindo em termos financeiros, pois em muitos casos, o Governo não estimula a pessoa com uma bolsa de estudos, por exemplo. Este blog está voltado à Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Como muitos já sabem, a expectativa de vida humana precisa aumentar muito em pouco tempo por meio de pesquisas e projetos científicos mais eficientes, resultando em novas substâncias terapêuticas, medicamentos, vacinas, aparelhos médicos, entre outros. Infelizmente há as doenças silenciosas, fatais e outros tipos de doenças muito complicadas desde muito tempo, e que a Comunidade Científica não consegue curá-las, prevení-las, diagnosticá-las muito precocemente para fazer um tratamento e prognóstico muito mais rápido e eficiente. Por isso e por outros motivos, é claro, infelizmente, muitas e muitas pessoas acabam falecendo diariamente no Brasil e nos demais países. O mundo científico precisa urgentemente de grandes inovações p/ a obtenção de melhores resultados nos trabalhos científicos, mesmo que estes trabalhos sejam muito difíceis de serem compreendidos e realizados. É fundamental a transparência e clareza dos resultados das pesquisas em artigos científicos e eventos científicos, pois estimula as pessoas a refletirem sobre o assunto, mesmo sendo muito difícil de ser entendido e explicado. Obviamente, é bem melhor mostrá-los p/ a Comunidade Científica, tais como gráficos detalhistas referentes à diferentes idades de camundongos em grupos distintos de uma pesquisa, podendo compará-los sobre diferentes parâmetros, levando em consideração que a genética do camundongo é quase igual à do humano estando relacionado ao estado de saúde-doença. Como é sabido, a idade é um fator muito relevante no processo de saúde- doença de uma pessoa, aliada à outros fatores que se relacionam entre si simultaneamente, como a genética, fisiologia humana, bioquímica, comorbidades existentes no corpo humano, entre outros. O mundo precisa urgentemente de métodos de diagnóstico, prognóstico e tratamento muito mais eficientes em vários casos, assim como de aparelhos médicos, medicamentos, substâncias terapêuticas, e outros. Com isso, o tempo de vida humano aumentará significativamente. Vale ressaltar que a medicina personalizada ou medicina de precisão é muito importante e inovadora, mas, assim como em vários campos da Ciência, há muitas lacunas que precisam ser preenchidas por meio de pesquisas e projetos bem mais eficazes. É claro que a teoria nem sempre se alia à prática, dependendo do assunto de que se trata, o trabalho dos profissionais da área científica é muito desafiador, complexo e complicado, mesmo havendo grandes interações entre várias equipes de vários países, porém, os benefícios de tais resultados alcançados são muito melhores e eficientes. Observação: Há pessoas que fazem parte da Comunidade Científica que acreditam que no futuro a Imortalidade Física Humana poderá ser atingida. Se você puder divulgar o blog será muito importante, sem sombras de dúvidas. Se cada um que acessar o blog e divulgar o mesmo, o resultado destas atitudes será muito significativo em vários aspectos p/ a sociedade nacional e mundial. Há uma grande quantidade de trabalhos muito importantes e inovadores feitos por outras pessoas no blog. Saúde e Paz pra Você e p/ as Demais Pessoas Sempre!! Por um Mundo Sempre Melhor!! #Law #Direito #Vida #Life #Health #Saúde #Authoriries #Autoridades #Investigations #Investigações #País #Country #City #Cidade #HumanLongevity #Idade(s) #Age #Ages #Future #Time #Respect #Respeito #Pessoa #Pessoas #Person #People #Internet #Data #HumanRights #DireitosHumanos #Team #Equipe #Govern #Governo #Probabilidade(s) #Probabilities #Probability #Fato #Fact #TypesOfCommunication #Energy #Energia#Universe #Universo #CreatorOfTheUniverse #CriadorDoUniverso #Name #Nome #ForABetterWorldAlways #ProteçãoDoMundoSempre #PorUmMundoMelhorSempre #TodasAsManeiras #AllWays #AllProbabilities #TodasProbabilidades #Situations #Situações #Fala #Speak #Listen #Escuta #Write #Escrita #Typing #Redigir #Read #Ler #Feelings #Sentimentos #Actions #Ações #Work #Trabalho #FutureGenerations #GeraçõesFuturas #Contributions #Contribuições #ScientificCommunity #ComunidadeCientífica
————————————————————————– ———– —————————
A expectativa de vida humana precisa aumentar muito mais rápido por meio de pesquisas e projetos mais eficientes. Assim, o mundo terá medicamentos, substâncias terapêuticas, dispositivos médicos e vacinas muito mais eficientes, por exemplo. Infelizmente existem asdoenças fatais em nosso mundo. Os métodos de prevenção, diagnóstico, prognóstico e tratamento de doenças são sempre fundamentais para a vida humana. Em muitos casos, esses métodos precisam ser cada vez melhores por tecnologias mais eficientes.
Compartilhar informações interessantes e importantes é um ato bem importante porque ajuda na difusão das mesmas no mundo. É claro, tem que ser verdadeiras e não fake news.
Sharing interesting and important information is a very important act because it helps in the diffusion of them in the world. Of course, it has to be true and not fake news.
Advertisement
- COMMENT
- 20 March 2019
Scientists rise up against statistical significance
Valentin Amrhein, Sander Greenland, Blake McShane and more than 800 signatories call for an end to hyped claims and the dismissal of possibly crucial effects.
When was the last time you heard a seminar speaker claim there was ‘no difference’ between two groups because the difference was ‘statistically non-significant’?
If your experience matches ours, there’s a good chance that this happened at the last talk you attended. We hope that at least someone in the audience was perplexed if, as frequently happens, a plot or table showed that there actually was a difference.
How do statistics so often lead scientists to deny differences that those not educated in statistics can plainly see? For several generations, researchers have been warned that a statistically non-significant result does not ‘prove’ the null hypothesis (the hypothesis that there is no difference between groups or no effect of a treatment on some measured outcome)1. Nor do statistically significant results ‘prove’ some other hypothesis. Such misconceptions have famously warped the literature with overstated claims and, less famously, led to claims of conflicts between studies where none exists.
We have some proposals to keep scientists from falling prey to these misconceptions.
Pervasive problem
Let’s be clear about what must stop: we should never conclude there is ‘no difference’ or ‘no association’ just because a P value is larger than a threshold such as 0.05 or, equivalently, because a confidence interval includes zero. Neither should we conclude that two studies conflict because one had a statistically significant result and the other did not. These errors waste research efforts and misinform policy decisions.
For example, consider a series of analyses of unintended effects of anti-inflammatory drugs2. Because their results were statistically non-significant, one set of researchers concluded that exposure to the drugs was “not associated” with new-onset atrial fibrillation (the most common disturbance to heart rhythm) and that the results stood in contrast to those from an earlier study with a statistically significant outcome.
Now, let’s look at the actual data. The researchers describing their statistically non-significant results found a risk ratio of 1.2 (that is, a 20% greater risk in exposed patients relative to unexposed ones). They also found a 95% confidence interval that spanned everything from a trifling risk decrease of 3% to a considerable risk increase of 48% (P = 0.091; our calculation). The researchers from the earlier, statistically significant, study found the exact same risk ratio of 1.2. That study was simply more precise, with an interval spanning from 9% to 33% greater risk (P = 0.0003; our calculation).
It is ludicrous to conclude that the statistically non-significant results showed “no association”, when the interval estimate included serious risk increases; it is equally absurd to claim these results were in contrast with the earlier results showing an identical observed effect. Yet these common practices show how reliance on thresholds of statistical significance can mislead us (see ‘Beware false conclusions’).
These and similar errors are widespread. Surveys of hundreds of articles have found that statistically non-significant results are interpreted as indicating ‘no difference’ or ‘no effect’ in around half (see ‘Wrong interpretations’ and Supplementary Information).
In 2016, the American Statistical Association released a statement in The American Statistician warning against the misuse of statistical significance and P values. The issue also included many commentaries on the subject. This month, a special issue in the same journal attempts to push these reforms further. It presents more than 40 papers on ‘Statistical inference in the 21st century: a world beyond P < 0.05’. The editors introduce the collection with the caution “don’t say ‘statistically significant’”3. Another article4 with dozens of signatories also calls on authors and journal editors to disavow those terms.
We agree, and call for the entire concept of statistical significance to be abandoned.
We are far from alone. When we invited others to read a draft of this comment and sign their names if they concurred with our message, 250 did so within the first 24 hours. A week later, we had more than 800 signatories — all checked for an academic affiliation or other indication of present or past work in a field that depends on statistical modelling (see the list and final count of signatories in the Supplementary Information). These include statisticians, clinical and medical researchers, biologists and psychologists from more than 50 countries and across all continents except Antarctica. One advocate called it a “surgical strike against thoughtless testing of statistical significance” and “an opportunity to register your voice in favour of better scientific practices”.
We are not calling for a ban on P values. Nor are we saying they cannot be used as a decision criterion in certain specialized applications (such as determining whether a manufacturing process meets some quality-control standard). And we are also not advocating for an anything-goes situation, in which weak evidence suddenly becomes credible. Rather, and in line with many others over the decades, we are calling for a stop to the use of P values in the conventional, dichotomous way — to decide whether a result refutes or supports a scientific hypothesis5.
Quit categorizing
The trouble is human and cognitive more than it is statistical: bucketing results into ‘statistically significant’ and ‘statistically non-significant’ makes people think that the items assigned in that way are categorically different6–8. The same problems are likely to arise under any proposed statistical alternative that involves dichotomization, whether frequentist, Bayesian or otherwise.
Unfortunately, the false belief that crossing the threshold of statistical significance is enough to show that a result is ‘real’ has led scientists and journal editors to privilege such results, thereby distorting the literature. Statistically significant estimates are biased upwards in magnitude and potentially to a large degree, whereas statistically non-significant estimates are biased downwards in magnitude. Consequently, any discussion that focuses on estimates chosen for their significance will be biased. On top of this, the rigid focus on statistical significance encourages researchers to choose data and methods that yield statistical significance for some desired (or simply publishable) result, or that yield statistical non-significance for an undesired result, such as potential side effects of drugs — thereby invalidating conclusions.
The pre-registration of studies and a commitment to publish all results of all analyses can do much to mitigate these issues. However, even results from pre-registered studies can be biased by decisions invariably left open in the analysis plan9. This occurs even with the best of intentions.
Again, we are not advocating a ban on P values, confidence intervals or other statistical measures — only that we should not treat them categorically. This includes dichotomization as statistically significant or not, as well as categorization based on other statistical measures such as Bayes factors.
One reason to avoid such ‘dichotomania’ is that all statistics, including P values and confidence intervals, naturally vary from study to study, and often do so to a surprising degree. In fact, random variation alone can easily lead to large disparities in P values, far beyond falling just to either side of the 0.05 threshold. For example, even if researchers could conduct two perfect replication studies of some genuine effect, each with 80% power (chance) of achieving P < 0.05, it would not be very surprising for one to obtain P < 0.01 and the other P > 0.30. Whether a P value is small or large, caution is warranted.
We must learn to embrace uncertainty. One practical way to do so is to rename confidence intervals as ‘compatibility intervals’ and interpret them in a way that avoids overconfidence. Specifically, we recommend that authors describe the practical implications of all values inside the interval, especially the observed effect (or point estimate) and the limits. In doing so, they should remember that all the values between the interval’s limits are reasonably compatible with the data, given the statistical assumptions used to compute the interval7,10. Therefore, singling out one particular value (such as the null value) in the interval as ‘shown’ makes no sense.
We’re frankly sick of seeing such nonsensical ‘proofs of the null’ and claims of non-association in presentations, research articles, reviews and instructional materials. An interval that contains the null value will often also contain non-null values of high practical importance. That said, if you deem all of the values inside the interval to be practically unimportant, you might then be able to say something like ‘our results are most compatible with no important effect’.
When talking about compatibility intervals, bear in mind four things. First, just because the interval gives the values most compatible with the data, given the assumptions, it doesn’t mean values outside it are incompatible; they are just less compatible. In fact, values just outside the interval do not differ substantively from those just inside the interval. It is thus wrong to claim that an interval shows all possible values.
Second, not all values inside are equally compatible with the data, given the assumptions. The point estimate is the most compatible, and values near it are more compatible than those near the limits. This is why we urge authors to discuss the point estimate, even when they have a large P value or a wide interval, as well as discussing the limits of that interval. For example, the authors above could have written: ‘Like a previous study, our results suggest a 20% increase in risk of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients given the anti-inflammatory drugs. Nonetheless, a risk difference ranging from a 3% decrease, a small negative association, to a 48% increase, a substantial positive association, is also reasonably compatible with our data, given our assumptions.’ Interpreting the point estimate, while acknowledging its uncertainty, will keep you from making false declarations of ‘no difference’, and from making overconfident claims.
Third, like the 0.05 threshold from which it came, the default 95% used to compute intervals is itself an arbitrary convention. It is based on the false idea that there is a 95% chance that the computed interval itself contains the true value, coupled with the vague feeling that this is a basis for a confident decision. A different level can be justified, depending on the application. And, as in the anti-inflammatory-drugs example, interval estimates can perpetuate the problems of statistical significance when the dichotomization they impose is treated as a scientific standard.
Last, and most important of all, be humble: compatibility assessments hinge on the correctness of the statistical assumptions used to compute the interval. In practice, these assumptions are at best subject to considerable uncertainty7,8,10. Make these assumptions as clear as possible and test the ones you can, for example by plotting your data and by fitting alternative models, and then reporting all results.
Whatever the statistics show, it is fine to suggest reasons for your results, but discuss a range of potential explanations, not just favoured ones. Inferences should be scientific, and that goes far beyond the merely statistical. Factors such as background evidence, study design, data quality and understanding of underlying mechanisms are often more important than statistical measures such as P values or intervals.
The objection we hear most against retiring statistical significance is that it is needed to make yes-or-no decisions. But for the choices often required in regulatory, policy and business environments, decisions based on the costs, benefits and likelihoods of all potential consequences always beat those made based solely on statistical significance. Moreover, for decisions about whether to pursue a research idea further, there is no simple connection between a P value and the probable results of subsequent studies.
What will retiring statistical significance look like? We hope that methods sections and data tabulation will be more detailed and nuanced. Authors will emphasize their estimates and the uncertainty in them — for example, by explicitly discussing the lower and upper limits of their intervals. They will not rely on significance tests. When P values are reported, they will be given with sensible precision (for example, P = 0.021 or P = 0.13) — without adornments such as stars or letters to denote statistical significance and not as binary inequalities (P < 0.05 or P > 0.05). Decisions to interpret or to publish results will not be based on statistical thresholds. People will spend less time with statistical software, and more time thinking.
Our call to retire statistical significance and to use confidence intervals as compatibility intervals is not a panacea. Although it will eliminate many bad practices, it could well introduce new ones. Thus, monitoring the literature for statistical abuses should be an ongoing priority for the scientific community. But eradicating categorization will help to halt overconfident claims, unwarranted declarations of ‘no difference’ and absurd statements about ‘replication failure’ when the results from the original and replication studies are highly compatible. The misuse of statistical significance has done much harm to the scientific community and those who rely on scientific advice. P values, intervals and other statistical measures all have their place, but it’s time for statistical significance to go.
Nature 567, 305-307 (2019)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00857-9
References
- Fisher, R. A. Nature 136, 474 (1935).Article Google Scholar
- Schmidt, M. & Rothman, K. J. Int. J. Cardiol. 177, 1089–1090 (2014).Article PubMed Google Scholar
- Wasserstein, R. L., Schirm, A. & Lazar, N. A. Am. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913 (2019).Article Google Scholar
- Hurlbert, S. H., Levine, R. A. & Utts, J. Am. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543616 (2019).Article Google Scholar
- Lehmann, E. L. Testing Statistical Hypotheses 2nd edn 70–71 (Springer, 1986).Google Scholar
- Gigerenzer, G. Adv. Meth. Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1, 198–218 (2018).Article Google Scholar
- Greenland, S. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 639–645 (2017).Article PubMed Google Scholar
- McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C. & Tackett, J. L. Am. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253 (2019).Article Google Scholar
- Gelman, A. & Loken, E. Am. Sci. 102, 460–465 (2014).Article Google Scholar
- Amrhein, V., Trafimow, D. & Greenland, S. Am. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1543137 (2019).Article Google Scholar
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
Latest on:
Research dataResearch managementWHO principles speed up ethical sharing of pathogen genomic dataCORRESPONDENCE Carbon emissions hit new high: warning from COP27NEWS Net-zero plans exclude AfricaWORLD VIEW
Jobs
- Science Fellow, Arc Institute (2023)Arc InstitutePalo Alto, CA, United States
- Core Investigator, Arc Institute (2023)Arc InstitutePalo Alto, CA, United States
- InvestigatorBlood Center of Wisconsin (BCW)Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Post Doc Fellow_Drug Discovery ProgramH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteTampa, FL, United States
Related Articles
- It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance
- Five ways to fix statistics
- How scientists fool themselves and how they can stop
- How sure are you of your result? Put a number on it
- Statisticians issue warning over misuse of p-values
Subjects
Sign up to Nature Briefing
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.Email addressYes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy.Sign up
Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print)
nature.com sitemap
Discover content
Publishing policies
Author & Researcher services
- Reprints & permissions
- Research data
- Language editing
- Scientific editing
- Nature Masterclasses
- Nature Research Academies
- Research Solutions
Libraries & institutions
Advertising & partnerships
Career development
Regional websites
Legal & Privacy
- Privacy Policy
- Use of cookies
- Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
- Legal notice
- Accessibility statement
- Terms & Conditions
- California Privacy Statement
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Advertisement
- nature
- editorials
- article
- EDITORIAL
- 20 March 2019
It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance
Looking beyond a much used and abused measure would make science harder, but better.
Fans of The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy know that the answer to life, the Universe and everything is 42. The joke, of course, is that truth cannot be revealed by a single number.
And yet this is the job often assigned to P values: a measure of how surprising a result is, given assumptions about an experiment, including that no effect exists. Whether a P value falls above or below an arbitrary threshold demarcating ‘statistical significance’ (such as 0.05) decides whether hypotheses are accepted, papers are published and products are brought to market. But using P values as the sole arbiter of what to accept as truth can also mean that some analyses are biased, some false positives are overhyped and some genuine effects are overlooked.Scientists rise up against statistical significance
Change is in the air. In a Comment in this week’s issue, three statisticians call for scientists to abandon statistical significance. The authors do not call for P values themselves to be ditched as a statistical tool — rather, they want an end to their use as an arbitrary threshold of significance. More than 800 researchers have added their names as signatories. A series of related articles is being published by the American Statistical Association this week (R. L. Wasserstein et al. Am. Stat. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913; 2019). “The tool has become the tyrant,” laments one article.
Statistical significance is so deeply integrated into scientific practice and evaluation that extricating it would be painful. Critics will counter that arbitrary gatekeepers are better than unclear ones, and that the more useful argument is over which results should count for (or against) evidence of effect. There are reasonable viewpoints on all sides; Nature is not seeking to change how it considers statistical analysis in evaluation of papers at this time, but we encourage readers to share their views (see go.nature.com/correspondence).
If researchers do discard statistical significance, what should they do instead? They can start by educating themselves about statistical misconceptions. Most important will be the courage to consider uncertainty from multiple angles in every study. Logic, background knowledge and experimental design should be considered alongside P values and similar metrics to reach a conclusion and decide on its certainty.
When working out which methods to use, researchers should also focus as much as possible on actual problems. People who will duel to the death over abstract theories on the best way to use statistics often agree on results when they are presented with concrete scenarios.
Researchers should seek to analyse data in multiple ways to see whether different analyses converge on the same answer. Projects that have crowdsourced analyses of a data set to diverse teams suggest that this approach can work to validate findings and offer new insights.
In short, be sceptical, pick a good question, and try to answer it in many ways. It takes many numbers to get close to the truth.
Nature 567, 283 (2019)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00874-8
Latest on:
Research dataResearch managementPublishingWHO principles speed up ethical sharing of pathogen genomic dataCORRESPONDENCE Carbon emissions hit new high: warning from COP27NEWS Net-zero plans exclude AfricaWORLD VIEW
Jobs
- Science Fellow, Arc Institute (2023)Arc InstitutePalo Alto, CA, United States
- Core Investigator, Arc Institute (2023)Arc InstitutePalo Alto, CA, United States
- InvestigatorBlood Center of Wisconsin (BCW)Milwaukee, WI, United States
- Post Doc Fellow_Drug Discovery ProgramH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research InstituteTampa, FL, United States
Related Articles
- Scientists rise up against statistical significance
- Five ways to fix statistics
- Many hands make tight work
- Statistical errors
- P values and the search for significance
Subjects
Sign up to Nature Briefing
An essential round-up of science news, opinion and analysis, delivered to your inbox every weekday.Email addressYes! Sign me up to receive the daily Nature Briefing email. I agree my information will be processed in accordance with the Nature and Springer Nature Limited Privacy Policy.Sign up
Nature (Nature) ISSN 1476-4687 (online) ISSN 0028-0836 (print)
nature.com sitemap
Discover content
Publishing policies
Author & Researcher services
- Reprints & permissions
- Research data
- Language editing
- Scientific editing
- Nature Masterclasses
- Nature Research Academies
- Research Solutions
Libraries & institutions
Advertising & partnerships
Career development
Regional websites
Legal & Privacy
- Privacy Policy
- Use of cookies
- Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
- Legal notice
- Accessibility statement
- Terms & Conditions
- California Privacy Statement
© 2022 Springer Nature Limited
Do the downloads!! Share!! The diffusion of very important information and knowledge is essential for the world progress always!! Thanks!!
- – > Mestrado – Dissertation – Tabelas, Figuras e Gráficos – Tables, Figures and Graphics – ´´My´´ Dissertation @ #Innovation #energy #life #health #Countries #Time #Researches #Reference #Graphics #Ages #Age #Mice #People #Person #Mouse #Genetics #PersonalizedMedicine #Diagnosis #Prognosis #Treatment #Disease #UnknownDiseases #Future #VeryEfficientDrugs #VeryEfficientVaccines #VeryEfficientTherapeuticalSubstances #Tests #Laboratories #Investments #Details #HumanLongevity #DNA #Cell #Memory #Physiology #Nanomedicine #Nanotechnology #Biochemistry #NewMedicalDevices #GeneticEngineering #Internet #History #Science #World
Pathol Res Pract. 2012 Jul 15;208(7):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.04.006. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
The influence of physical activity in the progression of experimental lung cancer in mice
Renato Batista Paceli 1, Rodrigo Nunes Cal, Carlos Henrique Ferreira dos Santos, José Antonio Cordeiro, Cassiano Merussi Neiva, Kazuo Kawano Nagamine, Patrícia Maluf Cury
- PMID: 22683274
- DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2012.04.006
Impact_Fator-wise_Top100Science_Journals
GRUPO_AF1 – GROUP AFA1 – Aerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Aeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto
GRUPO AFAN 1 – GROUP AFAN1 – Anaerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Anaeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto
GRUPO_AF2 – GROUP AFA2 – Aerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Aeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto
GRUPO AFAN 2 – GROUP AFAN 2 – Anaerobic Physical Activity – Atividade Física Anaeróbia – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto
Slides – mestrado – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto
CARCINÓGENO DMBA EM MODELOS EXPERIMENTAIS
DMBA CARCINOGEN IN EXPERIMENTAL MODELS
Avaliação da influência da atividade física aeróbia e anaeróbia na progressão do câncer de pulmão experimental – Summary – Resumo – ´´My´´ Dissertation – Faculty of Medicine of Sao Jose do Rio Preto
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22683274/
Abstract
Lung cancer is one of the most incident neoplasms in the world, representing the main cause of mortality for cancer. Many epidemiologic studies have suggested that physical activity may reduce the risk of lung cancer, other works evaluate the effectiveness of the use of the physical activity in the suppression, remission and reduction of the recurrence of tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of aerobic and anaerobic physical activity in the development and the progression of lung cancer. Lung tumors were induced with a dose of 3mg of urethane/kg, in 67 male Balb – C type mice, divided in three groups: group 1_24 mice treated with urethane and without physical activity; group 2_25 mice with urethane and subjected to aerobic swimming free exercise; group 3_18 mice with urethane, subjected to anaerobic swimming exercise with gradual loading 5-20% of body weight. All the animals were sacrificed after 20 weeks, and lung lesions were analyzed. The median number of lesions (nodules and hyperplasia) was 3.0 for group 1, 2.0 for group 2 and 1.5-3 (p=0.052). When comparing only the presence or absence of lesion, there was a decrease in the number of lesions in group 3 as compared with group 1 (p=0.03) but not in relation to group 2. There were no metastases or other changes in other organs. The anaerobic physical activity, but not aerobic, diminishes the incidence of experimental lung tumors.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
http://www.gmail.com http://www.google.com http://www.yahoo.com http://www.wordpress.com http://www.harvard.edu http://www.facebook.com/scientificblog http://www.wikipedia.org http://www.princeton.edu http://www.facebook.com http://www.twitter.com http://www.youtube.com http://www.linkedin.com http://www.forbes.com http://www.stanford.edu http://www.nobelprize.org http://www.nasa.gov http://www.mit.edu http://www.famerp.br http://www.unicamp.br http://www.ucla.edu http://www.caltech.edu http://www.michigan.edu http://www.cornell.edu http://www.yale.edu http://www.columbia.edu http://www.ox.ac.uk/ https://www.cam.ac.uk/ https://www.karolinska.se/ https://www.manchester.ac.uk/ http://cnpq.br/ https://www.jax.org/
Skip to main contentBecome a MemberLog InScienceMag.orgSearch
Advertisement
SHARE
Massive cancer genome study reveals how DNA errors drive tumor growth
By Jocelyn KaiserFeb. 5, 2020 , 1:00 PM
The largest ever study to analyze entire tumor genomes has provided the most complete picture yet of how DNA glitches drive tumor cell growth. Researchers say the results, released today in six papers in Nature and 17 in other journals, could pave the way for full genome sequencing of all patients’ tumors. Such sequences could then be used in efforts to match each patient to a molecular treatment.
The Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) project, which had a cast of more than 1300 scientists and clinicians around the world, analyzed 2658 whole genomes for 38 types of cancer, from breast to liver. “What stands out from these studies is the rigor of doing this in a systemic way,” says cancer geneticist Marcin Cieslik, who with colleague Arul Chinnaiyan at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, co-authored a commentary on the papers.
Previous published studies—such as those from the U.S.-funded Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)—originally looked only at the “exome,” protein-coding DNA that make up just 1% of the genome, of tumors because it was cheaper and easier. But this shortcut left out many changes that might drive cancer growth. With DNA sequencing costs falling, the TCGA and the International Cancer Genome Consortium turned to the entire genome about 10 years ago, sequencing all 3 billion DNA base pairs, including regulatory regions within noncoding DNA, for many tumor samples. These groups also looked for large rearrangements and other structural changes that exome sequencing misses.
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
Get more great content like this delivered right to you!
The PCAWG study’s 1300-strong team then dug into the data, which the other groups had made freely available in databases. Its analysis didn’t find many new so-called “driver” mutations within genes or noncoding DNA that power cell growth in tumors. But the researchers found “many more ways … to change those pathways” of cancer growth, said project member Lincoln Stein of the Ontario Institute for Cancer Research during a press call. For example, about one-fifth of the tumors had cells in which chromosomes shattered and rearranged, a bizarre phenomenon known as chromothripsis.
Each tumor had four to five driver mutations on average. In all, the PCAWG project was able to find at least one driver mutation in about 95% of the tumor samples, compared with just 67% with exome sequencing, says Peter Campbell of the Wellcome Sanger Institute, another project member. This means many more cancer patients can in principle now be matched to a drug that targets the protein made by that driver gene.
One PCAWG team also figured out how to trace the evolution of the mutations in a single tumor biopsy. The group confirmed that the initial mutations often cropped up years or decades before the cancers were diagnosed, suggesting many could be detected and treated much earlier. Another team found new patterns of mutations that result from environmental exposures such as tobacco smoke. The papers in other journals explore topics such as how often tumor genomes contain DNA from viruses that may have triggered the cancer (13% of the samples).
Some countries, such as the United Kingdom, are moving toward whole-genome sequencing of every cancer patient’s tumor to guide treatment; the full cost is still thousands of dollars per genome, Campbell says. The PCAWG analysis could be “a blueprint for these national programs,” he says. The PCAWG consortium has also begun to pool clinical records and genomes for 100,000 patients to create a “knowledge bank” that doctors could consult to determine the best treatment based on a patient’s tumor genome.
Cieslik and Chinnaiyan note that most of the same information could be gleaned by combining exome data with cheaper tests such as RNA sequencing and assays for rearrangements. “Whether whole-genome sequencing is ultimately the best method in the clinic remains to be seen,” Cieslik says. But the wealth of data from the PCAWG study, which is now freely available to researchers, will help biologists understand the mechanisms of cancer, they say.
Another caveat is that although targeted drugs can be less toxic and more powerful than chemotherapy, most patients’ tumors grow back as a few cells that resist the drug begin to expand. The patient may then need another drug to kill the resistant cells. “It’s certainly true that this kind of sequencing will not mean that all cancers are cured,” Campbell says. “But it points us to where we should be thinking about developing drugs for preventing resistance or treating it once it arises.” Posted in:
doi:10.1126/science.abb1834
Jocelyn Kaiser
Jocelyn is a staff writer for Science magazine.
More from News
- Scientists are racing to model the next moves of a coronavirus that’s still hard to predict
- Scientists discover virus with no recognizable genes
- Cutting-edge CRISPR gene editing appears safe in three cancer patients
Enjoy reading News from Science? Subscribe today. If you have already subscribed, log into your News account.
Got a tip?
Advertisement
Advertisement
ScienceInsider
- Major cancer institute sued by its own researchers over ‘tapering’ fundingBY MICHAEL PRICEFEB. 7, 2020
- Scientists are racing to model the next moves of a coronavirus that’s still hard to predictBY JON COHENFEB. 7, 2020
- U.S. attorneys warn of upcoming ‘spike’ in prosecutions related to China tiesBY CATHERINE MATACICFEB. 7, 2020
- Colombian university fires prominent biologist accused of sexual harassmentBY RODRIGO PÉREZ ORTEGA , LINDZI WESSELFEB. 7, 2020
- This powerful observatory studying the formation of galaxies is getting a massive, $54 million expansionBY SARAH WILDFEB. 7, 2020
Sifter
- Unusual Arctic warming explained by overlooked greenhouse gasesBY RODRIGO PÉREZ ORTEGA JAN. 21, 2020
- Ancient viruses found in Tibetan glacierBY RODRIGO PÉREZ ORTEGA JAN. 17, 2020
- Human body temperature has declined steadily over the past 160 yearsBY RODRIGO PÉREZ ORTEGA JAN. 10, 2020
- This enormous ancient fish is officially extinctBY EVA FREDERICKJAN. 7, 2020
- Hey mom, look at me! Garish coloring ensures these chicks get fedBY EVA FREDERICKJAN. 6, 2020
More SifterRead the Latest Issue of Science
7 February 2020
Vol 367, Issue 6478Table of Contents
- PHYSICSRekindling the flame
- Underground oil fires liberate carbon-free fuel
- CELL BIOLOGYCRISPR takes on cancer
- SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITYProsecutor details China probe that snared chemist
- SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITYProminent spider biologist spun a web of questionable data
- OCEANOGRAPHYClimate change spurs global speedup of ocean currents
Get Our E-Alerts
Receive emails from Science. See full listScience Table of ContentsScience Daily NewsWeekly News RoundupScience Editor’s ChoiceFirst Release NotificationScience Careers Job SeekerCountryCountry*AfghanistanAland IslandsAlbaniaAlgeriaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntarcticaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaAzerbaijanBahamasBahrainBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBhutanBolivia, Plurinational State ofBonaire, Sint Eustatius and SabaBosnia and HerzegovinaBotswanaBouvet IslandBrazilBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoBurundiCambodiaCameroonCanadaCape VerdeCayman IslandsCentral African RepublicChadChileChinaChristmas IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsColombiaComorosCongoCongo, The Democratic Republic of theCook IslandsCosta RicaCote D’IvoireCroatiaCubaCuraçaoCyprusCzech RepublicDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEquatorial GuineaEritreaEstoniaEthiopiaFalkland Islands (Malvinas)Faroe IslandsFijiFinlandFranceFrench GuianaFrench PolynesiaFrench Southern TerritoriesGabonGambiaGeorgiaGermanyGhanaGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuadeloupeGuatemalaGuernseyGuineaGuinea-BissauGuyanaHaitiHeard Island and Mcdonald IslandsHoly See (Vatican City State)HondurasHong KongHungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIran, Islamic Republic ofIraqIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKiribatiKorea, Democratic People’s Republic ofKorea, Republic ofKuwaitKyrgyzstanLao People’s Democratic RepublicLatviaLebanonLesothoLiberiaLibyan Arab JamahiriyaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacaoMacedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic ofMadagascarMalawiMalaysiaMaldivesMaliMaltaMartiniqueMauritaniaMauritiusMayotteMexicoMoldova, Republic ofMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarNamibiaNauruNepalNetherlandsNew CaledoniaNew ZealandNicaraguaNigerNigeriaNiueNorfolk IslandNorwayOmanPakistanPalestinianPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPhilippinesPitcairnPolandPortugalQatarReunionRomaniaRussian FederationRWANDASaint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Martin (French part)Saint Pierre and MiquelonSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSao Tome and PrincipeSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSint Maarten (Dutch part)SlovakiaSloveniaSolomon IslandsSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsSouth SudanSpainSri LankaSudanSurinameSvalbard and Jan MayenSwazilandSwedenSwitzerlandSyrian Arab RepublicTaiwanTajikistanTanzania, United Republic ofThailandTimor-LesteTogoTokelauTongaTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurkmenistanTurks and Caicos IslandsTuvaluUgandaUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayUzbekistanVanuatuVenezuela, Bolivarian Republic ofVietnamVirgin Islands, BritishWallis and FutunaWestern SaharaYemenZambiaZimbabwe
Email I agree to receive emails from AAAS/Science
and Science advertisers, including information on
products, services, and special offers which may
include but are not limited to news, career
information, & upcoming events.Sign up today
Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*)
© 2019 American Association for the Advancement of Science. All rights Reserved. AAAS is a partner of HINARI, AGORA, OARE, CHORUS, CLOCKSS, CrossRef and COUNTER.
Research
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to navigationJump to searchThis article is about the search for knowledge. For other uses, see Research (disambiguation).”Researcher” redirects here. For other uses, see Researcher (disambiguation).”Original research” redirects here. For the Wikipedia prohibition against user-generated, unpublished research, see Wikipedia:No original research
Basrelief sculpture “Research holding the torch of knowledge” (1896) by Olin Levi Warner. Library of Congress, Thomas Jefferson Building, in Washington, D.C.
Research is “creative and systematic work undertaken to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of humans, culture and society, and the use of this stock of knowledge to devise new applications.”[1] or in other hand Research is a process of steps used to collect and analyze information to increase our understanding of a topic or issue. At a general level, research consists of three steps: 1. Pose a question. 2. Collect data to answer the question. 3. Present an answer to the question. This should be a familiar process. You engage in solving problems every day and you start with a question, collect some information, and then form an answer Research is important for three reasons.1. Research adds to our knowledge: Adding to knowledge means that educators undertake research to contribute to existing information about issues 2.Research improves practice: Research is also important because it suggests improvements for practice. Armed with research results, teachers and other educators become more effective professionals. 3. Research informs policy debates: research also provides information to policy makers when they research and debate educational topics.[2]
A research project may also be an expansion on past work in the field. Research projects can be used to develop further knowledge on a topic, or in the example of a school research project, they can be used to further a student’s research prowess to prepare them for future jobs or reports. To test the validity of instruments, procedures, or experiments, research may replicate elements of prior projects or the project as a whole. The primary purposes of basic research (as opposed to applied research) are documentation, discovery, interpretation, or the research and development (R&D) of methods and systems for the advancement of human knowledge. Approaches to research depend on epistemologies, which vary considerably both within and between humanities and sciences. There are several forms of research: scientific, humanities, artistic, economic, social, business, marketing, practitioner research, life, technological, etc. The scientific study of research practices is known as meta-research.
Contents
- 1Etymology
- 2Definitions
- 3Forms of research
- 4Steps in conducting research
- 5Research methods
- 6Research ethics
- 7Problems in research
- 8Professionalisation
- 9Publishing
- 10Research funding
- 11See also
- 12References
- 13Further reading
- 14External links
Etymology[edit]
Aristotle, (384–322 BC), one of the early figures in the development of the scientific method.[3]
The word research is derived from the Middle French “recherche“, which means “to go about seeking”, the term itself being derived from the Old French term “recerchier” a compound word from “re-” + “cerchier”, or “sercher”, meaning ‘search’.[4] The earliest recorded use of the term was in 1577.[4]
Definitions[edit]
Research has been defined in a number of different ways, and while there are similarities, there does not appear to be a single, all-encompassing definition that is embraced by all who engage in it.
One definition of research is used by the OECD, “Any creative systematic activity undertaken in order to increase the stock of knowledge, including knowledge of man, culture and society, and the use of this knowledge to devise new applications.”[5]
Another definition of research is given by John W. Creswell, who states that “research is a process of steps used to collect and analyze information to increase our understanding of a topic or issue”. It consists of three steps: pose a question, collect data to answer the question, and present an answer to the question.[6]
The Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary defines research in more detail as “studious inquiry or examination; especially : investigation or experimentation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts, revision of accepted theories or laws in the light of new facts, or practical application of such new or revised theories or laws”[4]
Forms of research[edit]
“Original research” redirects here. For the Wikipedia prohibition against user-generated, unpublished research, see Wikipedia:No original research
Original research, also called primary research, is research that is not exclusively based on a summary, review, or synthesis of earlier publications on the subject of research. This material is of a primary-source character. The purpose of the original research is to produce new knowledge, rather than to present the existing knowledge in a new form (e.g., summarized or classified).[7][8]
Original research can take a number of forms, depending on the discipline it pertains to. In experimental work, it typically involves direct or indirect observation of the researched subject(s), e.g., in the laboratory or in the field, documents the methodology, results, and conclusions of an experiment or set of experiments, or offers a novel interpretation of previous results. In analytical work, there are typically some new (for example) mathematical results produced, or a new way of approaching an existing problem. In some subjects which do not typically carry out experimentation or analysis of this kind, the originality is in the particular way existing understanding is changed or re-interpreted based on the outcome of the work of the researcher.[9]
The degree of originality of the research is among major criteria for articles to be published in academic journals and usually established by means of peer review.[10] Graduate students are commonly required to perform original research as part of a dissertation.[11]
Scientific research is a systematic way of gathering data and harnessing curiosity. This research provides scientific information and theories for the explanation of the nature and the properties of the world. It makes practical applications possible. Scientific research is funded by public authorities, by charitable organizations and by private groups, including many companies. Scientific research can be subdivided into different classifications according to their academic and application disciplines. Scientific research is a widely used criterion for judging the standing of an academic institution, but some argue that such is an inaccurate assessment of the institution, because the quality of research does not tell about the quality of teaching (these do not necessarily correlate).[12]
Research in the humanities involves different methods such as for example hermeneutics and semiotics. Humanities scholars usually do not search for the ultimate correct answer to a question, but instead, explore the issues and details that surround it. Context is always important, and context can be social, historical, political, cultural, or ethnic. An example of research in the humanities is historical research, which is embodied in historical method. Historians use primary sources and other evidence to systematically investigate a topic, and then to write histories in the form of accounts of the past. Other studies aim to merely examine the occurrence of behaviours in societies and communities, without particularly looking for reasons or motivations to explain these. These studies may be qualitative or quantitative, and can use a variety of approaches, such as queer theory or feminist theory.[13]
Artistic research, also seen as ‘practice-based research’, can take form when creative works are considered both the research and the object of research itself. It is the debatable body of thought which offers an alternative to purely scientific methods in research in its search for knowledge and truth.
Scientific research[edit]
Main article: Scientific method
| This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: “Research” – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (June 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message) |
Primary scientific research being carried out at the Microscopy Laboratory of the Idaho National LaboratoryScientific research equipment at MITGerman maritime research vesselSonne
Generally, research is understood to follow a certain structural process. Though step order may vary depending on the subject matter and researcher, the following steps are usually part of most formal research, both basic and applied:
- Observations and formation of the topic: Consists of the subject area of one’s interest and following that subject area to conduct subject related research. The subject area should not be randomly chosen since it requires reading a vast amount of literature on the topic to determine the gap in the literature the researcher intends to narrow. A keen interest in the chosen subject area is advisable. The research will have to be justified by linking its importance to already existing knowledge about the topic.
- Hypothesis: A testable prediction which designates the relationship between two or more variables.
- Conceptual definition: Description of a concept by relating it to other concepts.
- Operational definition: Details in regards to defining the variables and how they will be measured/assessed in the study.
- Gathering of data: Consists of identifying a population and selecting samples, gathering information from or about these samples by using specific research instruments. The instruments used for data collection must be valid and reliable.
- Analysis of data: Involves breaking down the individual pieces of data to draw conclusions about it.
- Data Interpretation: This can be represented through tables, figures, and pictures, and then described in words.
- Test, revising of hypothesis
- Conclusion, reiteration if necessary
A common misconception is that a hypothesis will be proven (see, rather, null hypothesis). Generally, a hypothesis is used to make predictions that can be tested by observing the outcome of an experiment. If the outcome is inconsistent with the hypothesis, then the hypothesis is rejected (see falsifiability). However, if the outcome is consistent with the hypothesis, the experiment is said to support the hypothesis. This careful language is used because researchers recognize that alternative hypotheses may also be consistent with the observations. In this sense, a hypothesis can never be proven, but rather only supported by surviving rounds of scientific testing and, eventually, becoming widely thought of as true.
A useful hypothesis allows prediction and within the accuracy of observation of the time, the prediction will be verified. As the accuracy of observation improves with time, the hypothesis may no longer provide an accurate prediction. In this case, a new hypothesis will arise to challenge the old, and to the extent that the new hypothesis makes more accurate predictions than the old, the new will supplant it. Researchers can also use a null hypothesis, which states no relationship or difference between the independent or dependent variables.
Historical research[edit]
Main article: Historical methodGerman historian Leopold von Ranke (1795–1886), considered to be one of the founders of modern source-based history
The historical method comprises the techniques and guidelines by which historians use historical sources and other evidence to research and then to write history. There are various history guidelines that are commonly used by historians in their work, under the headings of external criticism, internal criticism, and synthesis. This includes lower criticism and sensual criticism. Though items may vary depending on the subject matter and researcher, the following concepts are part of most formal historical research:[14]
- Identification of origin date
- Evidence of localization
- Recognition of authorship
- Analysis of data
- Identification of integrity
- Attribution of credibility
Artistic research[edit]
The controversial trend of artistic teaching becoming more academics-oriented is leading to artistic research being accepted as the primary mode of enquiry in art as in the case of other disciplines.[15] One of the characteristics of artistic research is that it must accept subjectivity as opposed to the classical scientific methods. As such, it is similar to the social sciences in using qualitative research and intersubjectivity as tools to apply measurement and critical analysis.[16]
Artistic research has been defined by the University of Dance and Circus (Dans och Cirkushögskolan, DOCH), Stockholm in the following manner – “Artistic research is to investigate and test with the purpose of gaining knowledge within and for our artistic disciplines. It is based on artistic practices, methods, and criticality. Through presented documentation, the insights gained shall be placed in a context.”[17] Artistic research aims to enhance knowledge and understanding with presentation of the arts.[18] A more simple understanding by Julian Klein defines Artistic Research as any kind of research employing the artistic mode of perception.[19] For a survey of the central problematics of today’s Artistic Research, see Giaco Schiesser.[20]
According to artist Hakan Topal, in artistic research, “perhaps more so than other disciplines, intuition is utilized as a method to identify a wide range of new and unexpected productive modalities”.[21] Most writers, whether of fiction or non-fiction books, also have to do research to support their creative work. This may be factual, historical, or background research. Background research could include, for example, geographical or procedural research.[22]
The Society for Artistic Research (SAR) publishes the triannual Journal for Artistic Research (JAR),[23][24] an international, online, open access, and peer-reviewed journal for the identification, publication, and dissemination of artistic research and its methodologies, from all arts disciplines and it runs the Research Catalogue (RC),[25][26][27] a searchable, documentary database of artistic research, to which anyone can contribute.
Patricia Leavy addresses eight arts-based research (ABR) genres: narrative inquiry, fiction-based research, poetry, music, dance, theatre, film, and visual art.[28]
In 2016 ELIA (European League of the Institutes of the Arts) launched The Florence Principles’ on the Doctorate in the Arts.[29] The Florence Principles relating to the Salzburg Principles and the Salzburg Recommendations of EUA (European University Association) name seven points of attention to specify the Doctorate / PhD in the Arts compared to a scientific doctorate / PhD The Florence Principles have been endorsed and are supported also by AEC, CILECT, CUMULUS and SAR.
Documentary research[edit]
Main article: Documentary research
Steps in conducting research[edit]
Research is often conducted using the hourglass model structure of research.[30] The hourglass model starts with a broad spectrum for research, focusing in on the required information through the method of the project (like the neck of the hourglass), then expands the research in the form of discussion and results. The major steps in conducting research are:[31]
- Identification of research problem
- Literature review
- Specifying the purpose of research
- Determining specific research questions
- Specification of a conceptual framework, sometimes including a set of hypotheses[32]
- Choice of a methodology (for data collection)
- Data collection
- Verifying data
- Analyzing and interpreting the data
- Reporting and evaluating research
- Communicating the research findings and, possibly, recommendations
The steps generally represent the overall process; however, they should be viewed as an ever-changing iterative process rather than a fixed set of steps.[33] Most research begins with a general statement of the problem, or rather, the purpose for engaging in the study.[34] The literature review identifies flaws or holes in previous research which provides justification for the study. Often, a literature review is conducted in a given subject area before a research question is identified. A gap in the current literature, as identified by a researcher, then engenders a research question. The research question may be parallel to the hypothesis. The hypothesis is the supposition to be tested. The researcher(s) collects data to test the hypothesis. The researcher(s) then analyzes and interprets the data via a variety of statistical methods, engaging in what is known as empirical research. The results of the data analysis in rejecting or failing to reject the null hypothesis are then reported and evaluated. At the end, the researcher may discuss avenues for further research. However, some researchers advocate for the reverse approach: starting with articulating findings and discussion of them, moving “up” to identification of a research problem that emerges in the findings and literature review. The reverse approach is justified by the transactional nature of the research endeavor where research inquiry, research questions, research method, relevant research literature, and so on are not fully known until the findings have fully emerged and been interpreted.
Rudolph Rummel says, “… no researcher should accept any one or two tests as definitive. It is only when a range of tests are consistent over many kinds of data, researchers, and methods can one have confidence in the results.”[35]
Plato in Meno talks about an inherent difficulty, if not a paradox, of doing research that can be paraphrased in the following way, “If you know what you’re searching for, why do you search for it?! [i.e., you have already found it] If you don’t know what you’re searching for, what are you searching for?!”[36]
Research methods[edit]
The research room at the New York Public Library, an example of secondary research in progressMaurice Hilleman, the preeminent vaccinologist of the 20th century, is credited with saving more lives than any other scientist in that time[37]
The goal of the research process is to produce new knowledge or deepen understanding of a topic or issue. This process takes three main forms (although, as previously discussed, the boundaries between them may be obscure):
- Exploratory research, which helps to identify and define a problem or question.
- Constructive research, which tests theories and proposes solutions to a problem or question.
- Empirical research, which tests the feasibility of a solution using empirical evidence.
There are two major types of empirical research design: qualitative research and quantitative research. Researchers choose qualitative or quantitative methods according to the nature of the research topic they want to investigate and the research questions they aim to answer:Qualitative researchThis involves understanding human behavior and the reasons that govern such behavior, by asking a broad question, collecting data in the form of words, images, video etc. that is analyzed, and searching for themes. This type of research aims to investigate a question without attempting to quantifiably measure variables or look to potential relationships between variables. It is viewed as more restrictive in testing hypotheses because it can be expensive and time-consuming and typically limited to a single set of research subjects.[citation needed] Qualitative research is often used as a method of exploratory research as a basis for later quantitative research hypotheses.[citation needed] Qualitative research is linked with the philosophical and theoretical stance of social constructionism.
Social media posts are used for qualitative research.[38]Quantitative researchThis involves systematic empirical investigation of quantitative properties and phenomena and their relationships, by asking a narrow question and collecting numerical data to analyze it utilizing statistical methods. The quantitative research designs are experimental, correlational, and survey (or descriptive).[39] Statistics derived from quantitative research can be used to establish the existence of associative or causal relationships between variables. Quantitative research is linked with the philosophical and theoretical stance of positivism.
The quantitative data collection methods rely on random sampling and structured data collection instruments that fit diverse experiences into predetermined response categories.[citation needed] These methods produce results that are easy to summarize, compare, and generalize.[citation needed] Quantitative research is concerned with testing hypotheses derived from theory or being able to estimate the size of a phenomenon of interest.
If the research question is about people, participants may be randomly assigned to different treatments (this is the only way that a quantitative study can be considered a true experiment).[citation needed] If this is not feasible, the researcher may collect data on participant and situational characteristics to statistically control for their influence on the dependent, or outcome, variable. If the intent is to generalize from the research participants to a larger population, the researcher will employ probability sampling to select participants.[40]
In either qualitative or quantitative research, the researcher(s) may collect primary or secondary data. Primary data is data collected specifically for the research, such as through interviews or questionnaires. Secondary data is data that already exists, such as census data, which can be re-used for the research. It is good ethical research practice to use secondary data wherever possible.[41]
Mixed-method research, i.e. research that includes qualitative and quantitative elements, using both primary and secondary data, is becoming more common.[42] This method has benefits that using one method alone cannot offer. For example, a researcher may choose to conduct a qualitative study and follow it up with a quantitative study to gain additional insights.[43]
Big data has brought big impacts on research methods so that now many researchers do not put much effort into data collection; furthermore, methods to analyze easily available huge amounts of data have also been developed.[44]Non-empirical research
Non-empirical (theoretical) research is an approach that involves the development of theory as opposed to using observation and experimentation. As such, non-empirical research seeks solutions to problems using existing knowledge as its source. This, however, does not mean that new ideas and innovations cannot be found within the pool of existing and established knowledge. Non-empirical research is not an absolute alternative to empirical research because they may be used together to strengthen a research approach. Neither one is less effective than the other since they have their particular purpose in science. Typically empirical research produces observations that need to be explained; then theoretical research tries to explain them, and in so doing generates empirically testable hypotheses; these hypotheses are then tested empirically, giving more observations that may need further explanation; and so on. See Scientific method.
A simple example of a non-empirical task is the prototyping of a new drug using a differentiated application of existing knowledge; another is the development of a business process in the form of a flow chart and texts where all the ingredients are from established knowledge. Much of cosmological research is theoretical in nature. Mathematics research does not rely on externally available data; rather, it seeks to prove theorems about mathematical objects.
Research ethics[edit]
Research ethics is concerned with the moral issues that arise during or as a result of research activities, as well as the ethical conduct of researchers. Historically, the revelation of scandals such as Nazi human experimentation and the Tuskegee syphilis experiment led to the realisation that clear measures are needed for the ethical governance of research to ensure that people, animals and environments are not unduly harmed in research.
When making ethical decisions, we may be guided by different things and philosophers commonly distinguish between approaches like deontology, consequentialism, virtue ethics and value (ethics). Regardless of approach, the application of ethical theory to specific controversial topics is known as applied ethics and research ethics can be viewed as a form of applied ethics because ethical theory is applied in real-world research scenarios.
Ethical issues may arise in the design and implementation of research involving human experimentation or animal experimentation. There may also be consequences for the environment, for society or for future generations that need to be considered. Research ethics is most developed as a concept in medical research, the most notable Code being the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. Research in other fields such as social sciences, information technology, biotechnology, or engineering may generate different types of ethical concerns to those in medical research.[45][46][47][48]
Nowadays, research ethics is commonly distinguished from matters of research integrity that includes issues such as: scientific misconduct (such as fraud, fabrication of data and plagiarism), etc.
Problems in research[edit]
Meta-research[edit]
Main article: Meta-research
Meta-research is the study of research through the use of research methods. Also known as “research on research”, it aims to reduce waste and increase the quality of research in all fields. Meta-research concerns itself with the detection of bias, methodological flaws, and other errors and inefficiencies. Among the finding of meta-research is a low rates of reproducibility across a large number of fields. This widespread difficulty in reproducing research has been termed the “replication crisis.”[49]
Methods of research[edit]
In many disciplines, Western methods of conducting research are predominant.[50] Researchers are overwhelmingly taught Western methods of data collection and study. The increasing participation of indigenous peoples as researchers has brought increased attention to the lacuna in culturally-sensitive methods of data collection.[51] Western methods of data collection may not be the most accurate or relevant for research on non-Western societies. For example, “Hua Oranga” was created as a criterion for psychological evaluation in Māori populations, and is based on dimensions of mental health important to the Māori people – “taha wairua (the spiritual dimension), taha hinengaro (the mental dimension), taha tinana (the physical dimension), and taha whanau (the family dimension)”.[52]
Linguicism[edit]
Periphery scholars face the challenges of exclusion and linguicism in research and academic publication. As the great majority of mainstream academic journals are written in English, multilingual periphery scholars often must translate their work to be accepted to elite Western-dominated journals.[53] Multilingual scholars’ influences from their native communicative styles can be assumed to be incompetence instead of difference.[54]
Publication peer review[edit]
Peer review is a form of self-regulation by qualified members of a profession within the relevant field. Peer review methods are employed to maintain standards of quality, improve performance, and provide credibility. In academia, scholarly peer review is often used to determine an academic paper’s suitability for publication. Usually, the peer review process involves experts in the same field who are consulted by editors to give a review of the scholarly works produced by a colleague of theirs from an unbiased and impartial point of view, and this is usually done free of charge. The tradition of peer reviews being done for free has however brought many pitfalls which are also indicative of why most peer reviewers decline many invitations to review.[55] It was observed that publications from periphery countries rarely rise to the same elite status as those of North America and Europe, because limitations on the availability of resources including high-quality paper and sophisticated image-rendering software and printing tools render these publications less able to satisfy standards currently carrying formal or informal authority in the publishing industry.[54] These limitations in turn result in the under-representation of scholars from periphery nations among the set of publications holding prestige status relative to the quantity and quality of those scholars’ research efforts, and this under-representation in turn results in disproportionately reduced acceptance of the results of their efforts as contributions to the body of knowledge available worldwide.
Influence of the open-access movement[edit]
The open access movement assumes that all information generally deemed useful should be free and belongs to a “public domain”, that of “humanity”.[56] This idea gained prevalence as a result of Western colonial history and ignores alternative conceptions of knowledge circulation. For instance, most indigenous communities consider that access to certain information proper to the group should be determined by relationships.[56]
There is alleged to be a double standard in the Western knowledge system. On the one hand, “digital right management” used to restrict access to personal information on social networking platforms is celebrated as a protection of privacy, while simultaneously when similar functions are used by cultural groups (i.e. indigenous communities) this is denounced as “access control” and reprehended as censorship.[56]
Future perspectives[edit]
Even though Western dominance seems to be prominent in research, some scholars, such as Simon Marginson, argue for “the need [for] a plural university world”.[57] Marginson argues that the East Asian Confucian model could take over the Western model.
This could be due to changes in funding for research both in the East and the West. Focussed on emphasizing educational achievement, East Asian cultures, mainly in China and South Korea, have encouraged the increase of funding for research expansion.[57] In contrast, in the Western academic world, notably in the United Kingdom as well as in some state governments in the United States, funding cuts for university research have occurred, which some[who?] say may lead to the future decline of Western dominance in research.
Professionalisation [edit]
See also: Academic ranks, Academics, and ScientistsFurther information: Research fellow, Research associate, and Research assistant
In several national and private academic systems, the professionalisation of research has resulted in formal job titles.
In Russia[edit]
In present-day Russia, the former Soviet Union and in some post-Soviet states the term researcher (Russian: Научный сотрудник, nauchny sotrudnik) is both a generic term for a person who carried out scientific research, as well as a job position within the frameworks of the USSR Academy of Sciences, Soviet universities, and in other research-oriented establishments.
The following ranks are known:
- Junior Researcher (Junior Research Associate)
- Researcher (Research Associate)
- Senior Researcher (Senior Research Associate)
- Leading Researcher (Leading Research Associate)[58]
- Chief Researcher (Chief Research Associate)
Publishing[edit]
Cover of the first issue of Nature, 4 November 1869
Academic publishing is a system that is necessary for academic scholars to peer review the work and make it available for a wider audience. The system varies widely by field and is also always changing, if often slowly. Most academic work is published in journal article or book form. There is also a large body of research that exists in either a thesis or dissertation form. These forms of research can be found in databases explicitly for theses and dissertations. In publishing, STM publishing is an abbreviation for academic publications in science, technology, and medicine. Most established academic fields have their own scientific journals and other outlets for publication, though many academic journals are somewhat interdisciplinary, and publish work from several distinct fields or subfields. The kinds of publications that are accepted as contributions of knowledge or research vary greatly between fields, from the print to the electronic format. A study suggests that researchers should not give great consideration to findings that are not replicated frequently.[59] It has also been suggested that all published studies should be subjected to some measure for assessing the validity or reliability of its procedures to prevent the publication of unproven findings.[60] Business models are different in the electronic environment. Since about the early 1990s, licensing of electronic resources, particularly journals, has been very common. Presently, a major trend, particularly with respect to scholarly journals, is open access.[61] There are two main forms of open access: open access publishing, in which the articles or the whole journal is freely available from the time of publication, and self-archiving, where the author makes a copy of their own work freely available on the web.
Research funding[edit]
See also: Funding of science
| This section needs expansion with: funding for research in the humanities and other areas. Presently, only scientific research is addressed. You can help by adding to it. (April 2019) |
Most funding for scientific research comes from three major sources: corporate research and development departments; private foundations, for example, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation; and government research councils such as the National Institutes of Health in the USA[62] and the Medical Research Council in the UK. These are managed primarily through universities and in some cases through military contractors. Many senior researchers (such as group leaders) spend a significant amount of their time applying for grants for research funds. These grants are necessary not only for researchers to carry out their research but also as a source of merit. The Social Psychology Network provides a comprehensive list of U.S. Government and private foundation funding sources.
See also[edit]
- Advertising research
- European Charter for Researchers
- Funding bias
- Internet research
- List of countries by research and development spending
- List of words ending in ology
- Market research
- Marketing research
- Open research
- Operations research
- Participatory action research
- Psychological research methods
- Research-intensive cluster
- Scholarly research
- Secondary research
- Society for Artistic Research
- Social research
- Timeline of the history of scientific method
- Undergraduate research
References[edit]
- ^ OECD (2015). Frascati Manual. The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities. doi:10.1787/9789264239012-en. ISBN 978-9264238800.
- ^ CRESWELL, JOHN W (2012). EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PLANNING, CONDUCTING AND EVALUATING QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. University of Nebraska–Lincoln: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. p. 673. ISBN 0-13-136739-0.
- ^ “The Origins of Science“. Scientific American Frontiers.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c “Research”. Merriam-Webster.com. Merriam-Webster, Inc. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- ^ “OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms – Research and development UNESCO Definition”. stats.oecd.org. Archived from the original on 19 February 2007. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- ^ Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.[ISBN missing][page needed]
- ^ “What is Original Research? Original research is considered a primary source”. Thomas G. Carpenter Library, University of North Florida. Archived from the original on 9 July 2011. Retrieved 9 August 2014.
- ^ Rozakis, Laurie (2007). Schaum’s Quick Guide to Writing Great Research Papers. McGraw Hill Professional. ISBN 978-0071511223 – via Google Books.
- ^ Singh, Michael; Li, Bingyi (6 October 2009). “Early career researcher originality: Engaging Richard Florida’s international competition for creative workers” (PDF). Centre for Educational Research, University of Western Sydney. p. 2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 April 2011. Retrieved 12 January 2012.
- ^ Callaham, Michael; Wears, Robert; Weber, Ellen L. (2002). “Journal Prestige, Publication Bias, and Other Characteristics Associated With Citation of Published Studies in Peer-Reviewed Journals”. JAMA. 287 (21): 2847–50. doi:10.1001/jama.287.21.2847. PMID 12038930.
- ^ US Department of Labor (2006). Occupational Outlook Handbook, 2006–2007 edition. Mcgraw-hill. ISBN 978-0071472883 – via Google Books.
- ^ J. Scott Armstrong & Tad Sperry (1994). “Business School Prestige: Research versus Teaching”(PDF). Energy & Environment. 18 (2): 13–43. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
- ^ Roffee, James A; Waling, Andrea (18 August 2016). “Resolving ethical challenges when researching with minority and vulnerable populations: LGBTIQ victims of violence, harassment and bullying”. Research Ethics. 13 (1): 4–22. doi:10.1177/1747016116658693.
- ^ Garraghan, Gilbert J. (1946). A Guide to Historical Method. New York: Fordham University Press. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-8371-7132-6.
- ^ Lesage, Dieter (Spring 2009). “Who’s Afraid of Artistic Research? On measuring artistic research output” (PDF). Art & Research. 2 (2). ISSN 1752-6388. Retrieved 14 August 2011.
- ^ Eisner, E. W. (1981). “On the Differences between Scientific and Artistic Approaches to Qualitative Research”. Educational Researcher. 10 (4): 5–9. doi:10.2307/1175121. JSTOR 1175121.
- ^ Unattributed. “Artistic research at DOCH”. Dans och Cirkushögskolan (website). Retrieved 14 August2011.
- ^ Schwab, M. (2009). ”Draft Proposal”. Journal for Artistic Research. Bern University of the Arts.
- ^ Julian Klein (2010). “What is artistic research?”.
- ^ Schiesser, G. (2015). What is at stake – Qu’est ce que l’enjeu? Paradoxes – Problematics – Perspectives in Artistic Research Today, in: Arts, Research, Innovation and Society. Eds. Gerald Bast, Elias G. Carayannis [= ARIS, Vol. 1]. Wien/New York: Springer. pp. 197–210.
- ^ Topal, H. (2014). “Whose Terms? A Glossary for Social Practice: Research”. newmuseum.org. Archived from the original on 9 September 2014.
- ^ Hoffman, A. (2003). Research for Writers, pp. 4–5. London: A&C Black Publishers Limited.
- ^ Swiss Science and Technology Research Council (2011), Research Funding in the Arts
- ^ Borgdorff, Henk (2012), The Conflict of the Faculties. Perspectives on Artistic Research and Academia(Chapter 11: The Case of the Journal for Artistic Research), Leiden: Leiden University Press.
- ^ Schwab, Michael, and Borgdorff, Henk, eds. (2014), The Exposition of Artistic Research: Publishing Art in Academia, Leiden: Leiden University Press.
- ^ Wilson, Nick and van Ruiten, Schelte / ELIA, eds. (2013), SHARE Handbook for Artistic Research Education, Amsterdam: Valand Academy, p. 249.
- ^ Hughes, Rolf: “Leap into Another Kind: International Developments in Artistic Research,” in Swedish Research Council, ed. (2013), Artistic Research Then and Now: 2004–2013, Yearbook of AR&D 2013,Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.
- ^ Leavy, Patricia (2015). Methods Meets Art (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford. ISBN 978-1462519446.
- ^ http://www.elia-artschools.org/userfiles/File/customfiles/1-the-florence-principles20161124105336_20161202112511.pdf
- ^ Trochim, W.M.K, (2006). Research Methods Knowledge Base.
- ^ Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. 2008 ISBN 0-13-613550-1 (pages 8–9)
- ^ Shields, Patricia and Rangarjan, N. 2013. A Playbook for Research Methods: Integrating Conceptual Frameworks and Project Management. [1]. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.
- ^ Gauch, Jr., H.G. (2003). Scientific method in practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 2003 ISBN 0-521-81689-0 (page 3)
- ^ Rocco, T.S., Hatcher, T., & Creswell, J.W. (2011). The handbook of scholarly writing and publishing. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. 2011 ISBN 978-0-470-39335-2
- ^ “QUESTIONS ABOUT FREEDOM, DEMOCIDE, AND WAR”. http://www.hawaii.edu.
- ^ Plato, & Bluck, R. S. (1962). Meno. Cambridge, UK: University Press.
- ^ Sullivan P (13 April 2005). “Maurice R. Hilleman dies; created vaccines”. Washington Post.
- ^ Snelson, Chareen L. (March 2016). “Qualitative and Mixed Methods Social Media Research”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 15 (1): 160940691562457. doi:10.1177/1609406915624574.
- ^ Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
- ^ “Data Collection Methods”. uwec.edu.
- ^ Kara H. (2012). Research and Evaluation for Busy Practitioners: A Time-Saving Guide, p. 102. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- ^ Kara H (2012). Research and Evaluation for Busy Practitioners: A Time-Saving Guide, p. 114. Bristol: The Policy Press.
- ^ Creswell, John W. (2014). Research design : qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4522-2609-5.
- ^ Liu, Alex (2015). “Structural Equation Modeling and Latent Variable Approaches”. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 1–15. doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0325. ISBN 978-1118900772.
- ^ Stahl, B. C., Timmermans, J., & Flick, C. (2017). “Ethics of Emerging Information and Communication Technologies On the implementation of responsible research and innovation”. Science and Public Policy, 44(3), 369–381.
- ^ Iphofen, R. (2016). Ethical decision making in social research: A practical guide. Springer.
- ^ Wickson, F., Preston, C., Binimelis, R., Herrero, A., Hartley, S., Wynberg, R., & Wynne, B. (2017). “Addressing socio-economic and ethical considerations in biotechnology governance: The potential of a new politics of care”. Food ethics, 1(2), 193–199.
- ^ Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ethics in engineering practice and research. Cambridge University Press.
- ^ Ioannidis, John P. A.; Fanelli, Daniele; Dunne, Debbie Drake; Goodman, Steven N. (2 October 2015). “Meta-research: Evaluation and Improvement of Research Methods and Practices”. PLOS Biology. 13(10): –1002264. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002264. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 4592065. PMID 26431313.
- ^ Reverby, Susan M. (1 April 2012). “Zachary M. Schrag. Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965–2009. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 2010. Pp. xii, 245. $45.00”. The American Historical Review. 117 (2): 484–485. doi:10.1086/ahr.117.2.484-a. ISSN 0002-8762.
- ^ Smith, Linda Tuhiwai (2012). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples (2nd ed.). London: Zed Books. ISBN 978-1848139503.
- ^ Stewart, Lisa (2012). “Commentary on Cultural Diversity Across the Pacific: The Dominance of Western Theories, Models, Research and Practice in Psychology”. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. 6 (1): 27–31. doi:10.1017/prp.2012.1.
- ^ Canagarajah, A. Suresh (1 January 1996). “From Critical Research Practice to Critical Research Reporting”. TESOL Quarterly. 30 (2): 321–331. doi:10.2307/3588146. JSTOR 3588146.
- ^ Jump up to:a b Canagarajah, Suresh (October 1996). “‘Nondiscursive’ Requirements in Academic Publishing, Material Resources of Periphery Scholars, and the Politics of Knowledge Production”. Written Communication. 13 (4).
- ^ “Peer Review of Scholarly Journal”. http://www.PeerViewer.com. June 2017.
- ^ Jump up to:a b c Christen, Kimberly (2012). “Does Information Really Want to be Free? Indigenous Knowledge Systems and the Question of Openness”. International Journal of Communication. 6.
- ^ Jump up to:a b “Sun sets on Western dominance as East Asian Confucian model takes lead”. 24 February 2011. Retrieved 29 August 2016.
- ^ Job qualifications for Leading Researcher (in Russian)
- ^ Heiner Evanschitzky, Carsten Baumgarth, Raymond Hubbard and J. Scott Armstrong (2006). “Replication Research in Marketing Revisited: A Note on a Disturbing Trend” (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
- ^ J. Scott Armstrong & Peer Soelberg (1968). “On the Interpretation of Factor Analysis” (PDF). Psychological Bulletin. 70 (5): 361–364. doi:10.1037/h0026434. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 June 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2012.
- ^ J. Scott Armstrong & Robert Fildes (2006). “Monetary Incentives in Mail Surveys” (PDF). International Journal of Forecasting. 22 (3): 433–441. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.04.007. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 June 2010. Retrieved 11 January 2012.
- ^ “NIH Reporter”.
Further reading[edit]
- Groh, Arnold (2018). Research Methods in Indigenous Contexts. New York: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-72774-5.
- Cohen, N.; Arieli, T. (2011). “Field research in conflict environments: Methodological challenges and snowball sampling”. Journal of Peace Research. 48 (4): 423–436. doi:10.1177/0022343311405698.
- Soeters, Joseph; Shields, Patricia and Rietjens, Sebastiaan. 2014. Handbook of Research Methods in Military Studies New York: Routledge.
- Talja, Sanna and Pamela J. Mckenzie (2007). Editor’s Introduction: Special Issue on Discursive Approaches to Information Seeking in Context, The University of Chicago Press.
External links[edit]
- The dictionary definition of research at Wiktionary
- Quotations related to Research at Wikiquote
- Media related to Research at Wikimedia Commons
Navigation menu
- Not logged in
- Talk
- Contributions
- Create account
- Log in
Search
- Main page
- Contents
- Featured content
- Current events
- Random article
- Donate to Wikipedia
- Wikipedia store
Interaction
Tools
- What links here
- Related changes
- Upload file
- Special pages
- Permanent link
- Page information
- Wikidata item
- Cite this page
In other projects
Print/export
Languages
- This page was last edited on 9 February 2020, at 15:03 (UTC).
- Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
- Privacy policy
- About Wikipedia
- Disclaimers
- Contact Wikipedia
- Developers
- Statistics
- Cookie statement
- Mobile view
SEARCH
National Officials
Home Gaines Charter Township Elected OfficialsNational Officials
Gaines Charter Township
- Bid Opportunities
- Contacts
- Elected Officials
- History of Gaines Township
- Your Township
- What you should know about your Township
| President of the United StatesHonorable Joe Biden White House Opinion Telephone: 202-456-1111 White House General Telephone: 202-456-1414 Fax: 202-456-2461 E-mail: president@whitehouse.gov Web Site: www.whitehouse.gov Address: The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington D.C. 20500 | Vice-President of the United StatesHonorable Kamala HarrisWashington Office Telephone: 202-456-7549 Email: vice.president@whitehouse.gov Address: Eisenhower Exec. Office Building Washington, D.C. 20501 |
© Gaines Charter Township, MI
Employee Portal
This is historical material, “frozen in time.” The web site is no longer updated and links to external web sites and some internal pages will not work.
PRESIDENT | VICE PRESIDENT | FIRST LADY | MRS. CHENEY | NEWS
Your Government | History & Tours | Kids | E-mail | En Español
In Focus
- Afghanistan
- Africa
- Budget Management
- Defense
- Economy
- Education
- Energy
- Environment
- Global Diplomacy
- Health Care
- Homeland Security
- Immigration
- International Trade
- Iraq
- Judicial Nominations
- Middle East
- National Security
- Veterans
News & Features
Contacting the White House [En Español]
Mailing Address The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500 | |
| Phone Numbers Comments: 202-456-1111 Switchboard: 202-456-1414 FAX: 202-456-2461 | TTY/TDD Comments: 202-456-6213 Visitors Office: 202-456-2121 |
Please send your comments to comments@whitehouse.gov. Due to the large volume of e-mail received, the White House cannot respond to every message. For further up-to-date information on Presidential initiatives, current events, and topics of interest to you, please continue to use the White House website.
Note: Please submit messages in text format only. This inbox is unable to receive e-mails that contain graphics or attachments. After it arrives, you will receive an e-mail confirmation indicating successful delivery.
Vice President Richard Cheney: vice_president@whitehouse.gov
Communications With Other Federal Government Agencies
If you have a question about a particular government benefit, program or service, contact USA.gov.
USA.gov is the official U.S. gateway to all government information and is a catalyst for a growing electronic government.
Invitations and Greetings
Please follow these guidelines to extend an invitation to the President, Vice President, Mrs. Bush, or Mrs. Cheney. Please follow these guidelines for information about greetings.
Gifts & Items Sent to the White House
Items sent to the White House often experience a significant delivery delay and can be irreparably harmed due to the security screening process. Therefore, please do not send items of personal importance, such as family photographs, because items may be unable to be returned.
We also request that gifts of a consumable nature, such as food, flowers, and other perishable items, not be sent to the White House due to the security screening process. While the President and Mrs. Bush and Vice President and Mrs. Cheney appreciate your thoughtfulness, they request that you look instead to your local community for opportunities to assist your neighbors in need.
To comment on the web site or to report an error, please send feedback to the Web Development Team.
President | Vice President | First Lady | Mrs. Cheney | News & Policies
History & Tours | Kids | Your Government | Appointments | Jobs | Contact | Text only
Accessibility | Search | Privacy Policy | Help | Site Map
Science, Technology and Innovation - Time - Data - World @ Rodrigo Nunes Cal 
If you like excellent crypto projects with a strong team, please check Diminutive Coin (https://diminutivecoin.com). Only 200,000 coins will be produced. It has exceeded $1 and are still going strong. Check out theirs official Discord server here https://discord.gg/wSWYktwMFs.
LikeLike
xxx
LikeLike
https://store.diminutivecoin.com – All your favourite games for Steam, Origin, Battle.net, Uplay and Indie games up to 70 off! Digital games, Instant delivery 24/7.
LikeLike
Your non-stop source for digital game keys with instant downloads and 24/7/365 delivery only at https://store.diminutivecoin.com. Enjoy exclusive, premium deals on Xbox, Steam, Origin, PlayStation game keys, gift cards, prepaid cards and softwares at our digital marketplace. Daily updated list of Steam CD-Keys for all of your favorite games. Don’t worry about overpaying or subscriptions – ever again . Get the best digital product offers at the lowest prices at https://store.diminutivecoin.com, guaranteed.
LikeLike