List of people who gave me a positive feedback by e-mail about an excellent, detailed and very extensive e-mail list I did in 2015 from 20 Best Universities of the World. This e-mail list is more related to the Area of Biological Sciences. I sent it to a very big amount of excellent professors, scientists … Continue reading – ´´There was no statistically significant difference. And now? ´´Não houve diferença estatística significativa. E agora?´´ @ EDITORIAL 20 MARCH 2019 – Nature 567, 283 (2019) -> ´´It’s time to talk about ditching statistical significance – Looking beyond a much used and abused measure would make science harder, but better.´´ É hora de falar sobre a redução da significância estatística – Olhar além de uma medida muito usada e abusada tornaria a ciência mais difícil, mas melhor. ´´If researchers do discard statistical significance, what should they do instead? They can start by educating themselves about statistical misconceptions. Most important will be the courage to consider uncertainty from multiple angles in every study. When working out which methods to use, researchers should also focus as much as possible on actual problems. People who will duel to the death over abstract theories on the best way to use statistics often agree on results when they are presented with concrete scenarios.´´ & WHAT DOES STATISTICALLY SIGNIFICANT MEAN? by Jeff Sauro, PhD | October 21, 2014 @ Wikipedia Links about Time, Ageing, Age and Nobel Foundation & Nobel Prize Website – www.nobelprize.org @ OTHER VERY IMPORTANT INFORMATION @ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00857-9 @ https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-019-00874-8 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00031305.2019.1583913
